Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 203 2007 SLD 203 2007 PTD 2507 (2008) 97 TAX 95 2008 PLJ 332
Lahore High Court
Writ Petitions Nos. 19120 563 and 566 of 2002 and 24354 of 2000, decision dated: 9-10-2007, hearing DATE : 16-04-2007
NASIM SIKANDAR, J
Dr. Ilyas Zafar for Petitioner. Muhammad Ilyas Khan for
Respondents

Messrs ALHaj GHULAM MUHAMMAD & SONS

VS

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairman Government of Pakistan, Islamabad and 3 others

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Section: 5959,62,80,80D,Cl.(32D)inPart-IV of Second Schedule

(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss. 59, 62, 80-D [as inserted by Finance Act (XII of 1991) & Second Sched., Part-IV, Cl. (32-D) [as inserted through C.B.R. Notification S.R.O. 773(I)/2000, dated 31-10-2000 and omitted by Finance Ordinance (XXV of 2001)]---(C.B.R. Circular No. 21 of 2000, dated 11-9-2000)---Self-Assessment Scheme 2000-2001---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 25 & 199---Constitutional petition---Business of dealership of products---Commission on sale of products received by petitioners­ assessees engaged in such business as association of persons, individual and unregistered firm---Self-Assessment Scheme for assessment year, 2000-2001 issued through Circular No.21 of 2000, dated 11-9-2000---C.B.R.'s Clarification, dated 24-10-2000 that S.80'D of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 would apply to all categories of cases for assessment year 2000-2001 whether or not covered by Self-Assessment Scheme---Denial of benefit of such Scheme to petitioners for not being eligible under Cl. (32-D) in Part-IV of Second Sched. of Ordinance, 1979---Petitioners alleged such. denial to be discriminatory---Validity---Irrespective of nature of source of income, such Cl. (32-D) excluded provisions of S. 80-D of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 to turn over of different kinds of assessees who qualified for such Scheme---Petitioners, instead of declaring higher income and paying more tax, declared loss, thus, they were required to file regular return---Scheme would not become discriminatory for petitioners' failure to fulfil conditions laid down therein---Clause (32-D) of Second Schedule Part-IV, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was a rider for every assessee, who had declared loss in relevant year---Different rates applicable to different slabs of income would not be discriminatory---Person earning more must contribute more to snare burden of development in country---Petitioners were not being discriminated against in any manner---High Court dismissed constitutional petition---Principles. Jibendra Kishore Achharyya Chowdhury and 58 others v. The Province of East Pakistan and others PLD 1957 SC (Pak) 9; Zia Ullah Khan and others v. Government of Punjab and others…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492