Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 3484 2006 SLD 3484 (2006) 282 ITR 480
Gujarat High Court
IT REFERENCE No. 51 OF 1994 SEPTEMBER 1, 2005
D.A. MEHTA AND MS. H.N. DEVANI, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Bileshwar Khand Udyog Sahakari Mandi Ltd.*

v.

Commissioner of IncomE tax

Law:

Section:

I. Section 37(1), read with section 40A(2), of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure - Year in which deductible - Assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83 - Central Government fixed price of levy sugar at Rs. 124.59 per quintal for crushing season 1971-72 - Assessee filed a writ petition in High Court to challenge said fixation of price - By virtue of interim order made by High Court in said petitions, assessee was permitted to sale levy sugar at Rs.150 per quintal - On 12-3-1973 assessee withdrew said petition and, accordingly, High Court dismissed same - Subsequently Levy Sugar Price Equalisation Fund Act, 1976 came into existence providing excess realisation together with interest was required to be paid into Equalisation Fund as constituted under said Act - High Court on 2-5-1980 passed order directing assessee to credit, to Equalisation fund, excess realisation - Assessee thereafter, claimed deduction of certain sum credited to Equalisation Fund in assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83 - Assessing Officer as well as Commissioner (Appeals) rejected claim of assessee - Whether since liability to return excess realisation arose on date when High Court dismissed writ petition and interim order passed therein became non-existent and inoperative, assessee could not claim deduction in years under consideration - Held, yes II. Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Business expenditure - Year in which deductible - Assessment years 1978-79 to 1980-81 - As per order made by Assistant CST, assessee was not required to pay any sales tax and, therefore, it obtained a refund of sales tax paid - However, Deputy CST issued notice seeking recovery of said amount along with interest on ground that refund was wrongly issued - Assessee, accordingly, made provisions of interests of certain sum for respective assessment years in question and claimed deductions on said provisions of interest - Assessing Officer disallowed claim of provision of interest, on ground that it did not relate to any of assessment years in question - On appeal, Commissioner (Appeals) allowed assessee's claim - Tribunal also confirmed order of Commissioner (Appeals) - Whether since assessee was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492