| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2009 SLG 21 2009 SLD 21 2009 PTD 1163 |
Federal Tax Ombudsman
Complaint No. 1291 of 2003, decision dated: 12-04-2004
, JUSTICE (RETD.) SALEEM AKHTAR, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Muhammad Anwar, Consultant (Dealing Officer). Zahid Hussain, ACMA, AR along with Sajid Hussain, Accountant for the Complainant. Faheem Muhammad, DCIT Companies Zone, Peshawar for the Complainant
Complaint No. 1291 of 2003, decision dated: 12-04-2004
, JUSTICE (RETD.) SALEEM AKHTAR, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Muhammad Anwar, Consultant (Dealing Officer). Zahid Hussain, ACMA, AR along with Sajid Hussain, Accountant for the Complainant. Faheem Muhammad, DCIT Companies Zone, Peshawar for the Complainant
Messrs CHINIOT ENTERPRISES (PVT.) LTD., HARIPUR
VS
SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 59,61,32A,80DD
Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000
Section: 2(3)(i)(b),9(b)
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss 59, 61, 32-A & 80DD---Income Tax Rules, 1982, R.190(1)---Self-Assessment Scheme, (2000-2001), para.9(a)(ii)---Establishment of Office of Federal 'Fax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.9---Self-Assessment Scheme---Notice for production of books---Supply of documents---Audit statement---Short document notice---Complaint was to the effect that the return filed under Self Assessment Scheme was wrongly excluded from Self-Assessment Scheme---Validity---Complainant had produced attested copies of documents which showed that the short documents notice did not contain diary number-Order sheet entry was made in the order sheet relating to previous assessment year, which was inserted afterwards---Interpolation of entries in the Order Sheet were found which established that no short document notice was issued at all---Audited account was found available in the assessment record---Allegations of the department were not substantiated---Return filed had fulfilled the condition of tax paid being higher by 10% or more---Action of the Assessing Officer excluding the complainant's return from the Self-Assessment Scheme was arbitrary', unjust, biased and oppressive which fell under the category of maladministration---Competent authority was ordered to withdraw the action taken by Taxation Officer for excluding the complainant's case from the ambit of Self-Assessment Scheme and accept the complainant's Return. (b) Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000)--- ----Ss.2(3)(i)(b) & 9(b)---Maladministration---Remedy of appeal---Assessment---Jurisdictional remedies of appeal, review or revision were available in the relevant legislation and related only to the decisions on matters enumerated therein---No such remedy had been provided in respect of a process employed in the conduct of assessment or related proceedings---Matter related to the process employed by the respondents against which no appeal, etc. was provided in the Income Tax legislation---Provisions of S.9(2) of the Ordinance did not stand in the way of investigation by the Federal Tax Ombudsman---Complaint was held to be competent forβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492