| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1025 2007 SLD 1025 2007 PTD 2119 2008 PTCL 177 (2007) 96 TAX 237 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.3726 of 2006, decision dated: 1st December, 2006
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE
Mian Abdul Ghaffar for Petitioner. Izhar-ul-Haque Sheikh for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No.3726 of 2006, decision dated: 1st December, 2006
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE
Mian Abdul Ghaffar for Petitioner. Izhar-ul-Haque Sheikh for
Respondents.
MESSRS S. FAZAL ILAHI &. SONS THROUGH REGISTRAR
VS
DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS and others
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Section: 25(4),81,81(1),81(2),81(3),81(4)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Customs Rules, 2001
Section: 109
Customs Act (IV of 1969)--Ss. 25(4) & 81---Customs Rules, 2001, R.109---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Provisional assessment of duty---Petitioner's/importer's goods were released under provisional assessment of customs duty, whereby in addition to payment of liability based on the declared value of the imported goods, authorities, under section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969 obtained postdated cheque and indemnity bond from petitioner for the difference in liability on account of higher value of the imported goods claimed by the .authorities---Pursuant to the provisions of S.81(4) of the Customs Act, 1969 the provisional assessment was declared to become final after lapse of one year in absence of a recorded finding and that event had happened in present case---Section 25(4) of Customs Act, 1969 had cast a duty on the taxing officer to demand proof or documents From the importer in respect of which corroboration or clarification was required---Such duty was re-inforced by the provisions of Rule 109 of the Customs Rules, 2001---No such demand was raised by, the authorities, nor any material was confronted to petitioner to substantiate the higher value claimed---Petitioner/importer could not be penalized for default committed by the authorities---Under S.81(4) of Customs Act, 1969, version of price given by petitioner/importer stood accepted and finalized upon. the failure of the authorities to establish on record through 'a speaking order, the higher price claimed by them at the time of provisional assessment---Petitioner/importer ought not be saddled with an attributed value to sustain liability, if that were done., it would put a premium on imaginary claims, mechanical assessments and time wasting measures to exhaust the statutory period. Messrs Farooq Woollen Mills v. Collector of Customs, Customs Dryport Sambrial and 2 others ' 2004 PTD .795; Messrs Trade International through Proprietor Habib ur Rehman v. Deputy Collector of Customs (Bank Guarantee Section) and 3 others 2005 PTD 1968; Collector of Customs (Appraisement), Karachi v. Messrs Auto Mobile Corporation of Pakistan, Karachi 2005 PTD 2116 and Messrs Dewan…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492