| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 171 2007 SLD 171 2007 PTD 744 (2007) 95 TAX 327 |
Lahore High Court
I.T.A. No.683 of 1999, decided 30-11-2006
SH. AZMAT SAEED AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Shahbaz Butt for Appellant. Shahid Jamil for
Respondents
I.T.A. No.683 of 1999, decided 30-11-2006
SH. AZMAT SAEED AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Shahbaz Butt for Appellant. Shahid Jamil for
Respondents
MEHMOOD AHMAD
VS
Income Tax APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE through Chairman and 2 others
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 65(1),65(1)(b),65(1)(c),134,136
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)----Ss. 65(1), 134 & 136---Notice under S.65 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Notice was alleged to be invalid for not specifying as to whether same was issued in terms of S. 65(1)(a) or (b) or (c) thereof---Raising of such question by assessee before Appellate Authority finding mentioned in its order---Appellate Tribunal dismissed appeal of assessee for not raising such question before Appellate Authority---Validity---Real matter in controversy having not been adjudicated upon by Tribunal, High Court remanded case to Tribunal to decide the same afresh after hearing parties. ORDER This appeal is directed against the order of the Tribunal, dated 17-9-1999 whereby the appeal filed by the present appellant was dismissed. 2. The primary grievance raised by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the initial notice under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was defective as it was deficient in material particulars inasmuch as it did not specify as to whether it was issued in terms of section 65(1)(a) or (b) or (c) thereof. It is contended that this aspect of the matter was specifically raised…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492