Case Details

Citation(s)
2008 SLG 311 2008 SLD 311 2008 PTD 553
Federal Tax Ombudsman
Complaint No. 958-L of 2005, decision dated: 26-09-2005
JUSTICE (RETD.) MUNIR A. SHAIKH, FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN
Muhammad Akbar, Advisor, Dealing Officer. Shahid Pervaiz Jami for the Complainant. Muhammad Akram Ch. D.C. Central Excise, Sales Tax and Customs, Multan for
Respondents

Messrs S.S. OIL MILLS LIMITED, LAHORE

VS

SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990

Section: 36,36(3)

Law: Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000

Section: 2(3)

Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--S. 36(3)-Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), S.2(3)---Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Limitation---Complainant contended that Order-in-Original passed by the Deputy Collector (Adjudication) was without lawful jurisdiction on account of limitation provided under S.36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 as show-cause notice, dated 4-11-2003 was contested vide reply, dated 17-12-2003 but the case was decided vide Order-in-Original, dated 11-5-2005---Mandatory proviso to S.36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 provided that Order-in-Original was to . be passed within 135 days of the issuance of show cause---Limitation period expired on 20-3-2004---Adjudication authority failed to observe the time limitation so prescribed and passed the Order-in-Original on 11-6-2005 creating sales tax liability along with additional tax and penalty long after the expiry of the prescribed time limitation---Order was void because it was passed after the time-limit prescribed in S.36(3) of the Sales Tax. Act, 1990---Validity---Show-cause notice was issued on 4-11-2003 and the Order-in-Original creating liabilities was passed on 11-6-2005 (dispatched on 30-6-2005) after a period of one year, seven months and 26 days (computed from the date of dispatch) in violation of the provisions of S.36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Order being violative of the provisions of S.36(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 was clearly hit by limitation as provided in law and maladministration was established---Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that the Revenue Division should direct the competent authority to cancel the Order-in-Original. Complaint No.805 of 2003 (Messrs Pace International Rawalpindi v. Secretary Revenue Division, Islamabad) and S.R.O. 723(I)/05 rel. Sales Tax Appeal No.2149/LB of 2002 reversed. DECISION/FINDINGS JUSTICE (RETD.) MUNIR A. SHAIKH (FEDERAL TAX OMBUDSMAN).---This complaint of `maladministration' is directed against Order-in-Original No.1002/05 passed by the Deputy Collector (Adjudication)., Multan without lawful jurisdiction on account of time limitation provided under section 36(3) of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492