| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2009 SLG 50 2009 SLD 50 2009 PTCL 197 2009 PTD 41 (2009) 99 TAX 108 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 4200 of 2008, heard on 10-10-2008
KHAWAJA FAROOQ SAEED, J
Sajjad Ijaz Hotiana for Petitioner. Mian Yusuf Umar for
Respondent
Writ Petition No. 4200 of 2008, heard on 10-10-2008
KHAWAJA FAROOQ SAEED, J
Sajjad Ijaz Hotiana for Petitioner. Mian Yusuf Umar for
Respondent
Messrs BISMA TEXTILE MILLS LTD. through Chief Executive
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Revenue Division/Chairman F.B.R. and 2 others
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 177
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)--S. 177---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---C.B.R. Circular No.1(1)S(ITAS)/2004---Constitutional petition---Audit---Cases which have been revised under C.B.R. Circular No.1(1)S(ITAS)/2004 or otherwise if the return has been revised and payment has been made by the assessee, no further action shall be taken against him---Assessee, in the present case, having revised its return under the C.B.R. Circular, it was specifically covered by the same---No proceedings, therefore, could be initiated for auditing the assessee under S.177, Income Tax Ordinance, 2001---Proceedings initiated against the assessee were declared to be as against law and were therefore, cancelled. Writ Petition No.9266 of 2004 fol. Ch. Muhammad Hussain and others v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2005 PTD 152 ref. JUDGMENT KHAWAJA FAROOQ SAEED, J.---Through this writ the petitioner wants indulgence of this Court to declare the notice issued under section 177 to be as unlawful. 2. The brief facts of the present writ petition are that the petitioner for the tax year, 2003 was selected for audit in terms of section 177 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, after having accepted the return which was a deemed assessment. Since tax year, 2003 was first year of the assessment under the Ordinance mentioned (supra), the criteria was fixed after Commissioner's Conference by the Federal Board of Revenue. The petitioner challenged the selection for audit for a number of reasons including that the same is against the parameters decided by the said Conference. 3. This Court vide judgment, dated 28-6-2005 in Writ Petition No.9266 of 2004 allowed the constitutional petition and declared the same as not sustainable in law. The reference was to the judgment of this Hon'ble Court reported as (2005 PTD 152) ref: "Ch. Muhammad Hussain and others v. Commissioner of Income Tax". This judgment was not challenged before any Court, hence attained finality. The case subsequently was again selected for audit on the basis of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case of "Commissioner of Income Tax and others v. Fatima Sharif Textile, Kasur and others" reported as…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492