Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 1581 2007 SLD 1581 2007 PLD 93
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Shariat Appeal No.23 of 2003, decision dated: 28-09-2006
JAVED IQBAL, MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, RAJA FAYYAZ AHMED, DR. ALLAMA KHALID MEHMOOD, AND ALLAMA RASHID AHMED, JULLUNDHARI, JJ
Dr. Babar Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Ch. Munir Sadiq, Advocate Supreme Court.

SHOUKAT ALI

VS

THE STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302/34---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S.14---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203-F---Reappraisal of evidence---Proverbial Lalkara---Common intention---Friendship or relationship of witnesses with deceased---Effect---Natural witnesses---Scope---Object of section 34, P.P.C.---Allegation against accused appellant was that he along with two accused persons committed murder of deceased---Motive setup in F.I.R. was that as deceased took charge of agricultural farm from accused, therefore, out of grudge he committed murder of deceased---Accused was acquitted of charge under S.14 of Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 and was convicted and sentenced to life imprisomnent by Trial Court under section 302/34, P.P.C.---One co-accused was sentenced to death by Trial Court but Federal Shariat Court altered death to life imprisonment---Second co-accused was acquitted by Trial Court---Accused contended that no overt act except proverbial Lalkara, was attributed to him in F.I.R. and at trial; that motive was not` established on record; that prosecution evidence was furnished by interested and related witnesses; that prosecution evidence was self-contradictory and uncorroborated by independent evidence and that F.I.R. was lodged with delay benefit of which was to go to accused---Validity---Prosecution had alleged that murder of deceased was committed by all accused with common intention---Prosecution witnesses were subjected to lengthy cross-examination but nothing beneficial to accused could be elicited from them who supported each other on material points---Few minor contradictions having no substantial bearing on merits of case could be ignored safely---Prosecution witnesses had no enmity to get accused/appellant involved in heinous offence like murder, abetment and instigation as no grudge had been alleged against them---Friendship or relationship with deceased was not sufficient to discredit a witness particularly when there was no motive to falsely involve accused---In assessing value of evidence of eye-witnesses, it was necessary to examine whether in…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492