| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1971 SLG 153 1971 SLD 153 1971 SCMR 18 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 83-D of 1970, decision dated: 29th May 1970
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J. AND SALAHUDDIN AHMAD, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 83-D of 1970, decision dated: 29th May 1970
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J. AND SALAHUDDIN AHMAD, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
ABDUL RASHID
VS
ALI NAWAZ---Respondent
Law:
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 439(1)-Revision-Sentence-Enhancement- Reference by Sessions Judge recommending for setting aside sentence under S. 324, P. P. C. and ordering fresh trial under S. 326, P. P. C.-High Court maintaining conviction under S. 324, P. P. C. but enhancing sentence of Rs. 30 fine to 3 year's R. L-Sentence though maximum, yet, held, neither illegal nor inappropriate in circumstances of case-Supreme Court, held further, does not interfere with a legal sentence. ' The only point urged on accused petitioner's behalf is that although the High Court has only purported to enhance the sentence under section 324, P. P. C., it has actually imposed a sentence which was appropriate in the case of conviction under section 326, P. P. C. Held : A sentence of 3 years under section 324, P. P. C. is the maximum sentence that can be awarded, but it is certainly not the maximum sentence under section 326, P. P. C. The maximum sentence provided for the latter offence is transportation for life. It cannot, therefore, be said that the High Court has really imposed a sentence for a higher offence. The sentence imposed under section 324 is a legal sentence, even though it might be the maximum sentence. No question of principle is involved here. The sentence awarded appears to be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of this case. This petition is accordingly, dismissed, as the Supreme Court does not interfere with a legal sentence. Aminul Haq, Advocate-on-Record Supreme Court for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondent. Date of hearing : 29th May 1970. JUDGMENT HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.-The petitioner was convicted under section 326 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 30 only, by a Magistrate of the First Class at Sadar (South) Comilla. Thereafter, the learned Sessions Judge, Comilla, made a reference to the High Court under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure pointing out that the petitioner was charged under section 326 of the Penal Code for having caused grievous injury to one, Kalimuddin, and also an incised injury to one, Kazrul Islam by dao blows. As a result of these Kalimuddin became…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492