| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1932 2007 SLD 1932 2007 PLC 464 |
Sindh High Court
Labour Appeals Nos.196 and 232 of 2003, decision dated: 1st June, 2007.
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Labour Appeals Nos.196 and 232 of 2003, decision dated: 1st June, 2007.
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
SAMIULLAH SHARIF
VS
FAUJI OIL TERMINAL AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PORT BIN QASIM, KARACHI through Secretary GBOD SAMIULLAH SHARIF vs FAUJI OIL TERMINAL AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, PORT BIN QASIM, KARACHI through Secretary GBOD
Law:
Section:
(a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)-------Ss. 2(g), 3 & S.Os.2-A, 12, 15---Regularization by conditions of employment of workman---Termination of service---Employers executed an agreement with the workmen for a period of 89 days and on its expiry then again executed a fresh agreement for a similar period---No concept of execution of agreement between a workman and the employer existed by which statutory rights of a workman could be curtailed or taken away as law did not permit the same---Services of a workman would have to be regulated in accordance with provisions of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 and not otherwise---Workman who had been employed on a job of permanent nature, his service could only be terminated by issuing him a letter of termination explicitly stating the reasons therefor, if he was not being removed on account of misconduct--In case of removing an employee on account a stigma on his career/conduct, he was to be issued a show-cause notice and an inquiry had to be conducted into the allegations levelled against him---By executing agreement with the workmen, employers had flagrantly violated provisions of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968---Employees/Workmen, in the present case, had been in the, continuous employment of employers for a number of years, instead of issuing them letters of appointment they were compelled to execute an agreement that too for a period of 89 days, which was purposely done with the intention of circumventing the law---Employing the workmen for considerably long time, but giving them break of one day, was just a fraud on statute which could neither be ignored nor overlooked. Enmay Zed Publication (Pvt.) v. Sindh Labour Appellate Tribunal and 2 others 2001 SCMR 565 ref. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XCI of 2002)--- ----Ss. 2(xxx), 46 & 48---West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S.2(i) & S.O.12---Termination of service---Grievance petition---Appeal---Status of `workman', determination…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492