Law:

Section:

West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968--- ----R. 19---West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), S.8---Appointment of lamberdar---After death of lamberdar, District Officer (Revenue) appointed the petitioner as successor lamberdar---On filing appeal by respondent, Executive District Officer (Revenue), set aside order of District Officer---Revision petition filed against order of Executive District Officer, having also been dismissed by Board of Revenue, petitioner had filed review petition---Petitioner had resigned front government service and was prepared to carry out duties as lamberdar---Petitioner had more land than the respondent and was better educated (F.Sc.) as compared to respondent who had passed primary stage---Being younger in age, it was expected that petitioner would deliver better---Review petition was accepted---Order passed by Executive District Officer (Revenue) and order passed by the Member (Judicial) Board of Revenue, were set aside and order passed by District Officer (Revenue), was upheld in review by Board of Revenue. Allah Ditta v. Salamat Ali and others PLD 1965 SC 393 ref. ORDER The petitioner has filed this review petition against the impugned order dated 19-6-2004 passed by the Member (Judicial-V), Board of Revenue, Punjab, Lahore. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that after the death of Lamberdar of Chak No.294/GB, Tehsil Toba Tek Singh, applications were called for and the District Officer (Revenue), Toba Tek Singh appointed the present petitioner as Lamberdar vide order dated 14-4-2003. Aggrieved by that order, appeal was preferred by the present respondent No.1 which was accepted by the Executive District Officer (Revenue), Toba Tek Singh vide order dated 2-9-2003 and revision petition filed against that order by Tanvir Ahmad, present petitioner in the Board of Revenue, Punjab was dismissed vide order 19-6-2004. Hence this review petition. 3. Arguments were heard and record was perused. Learned counsel for the petitioner and respondent No.1 also submitted written arguments which are available in the file of the case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the impugned orders passed by the Executive…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492