Law:

Section:

Administration of justice--- ----Court normally would accept the statement of all Advocates at Bar, but if the Advocates would start denying the statements given by them in the court, the whole purpose of accepting the statements at Bar would become redundant and unreliable. ORDER MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, J.---On 20-4-2010 by consent order was passed and the name of defendant No.1 was deleted from the array of the defendants. On last date, Mr. Saleem Ghulam Hussain Advocate filed his Vakalatnama on behalf of the defendant No.1 and along with him defendant No.1 was also present in the Court. The defendant No.1 had also filed his statement in Court in which he had clearly mentioned that neither he had sold nor intended to sell the clothes mentioned in annexures H/1 and H/3 of the plaint, at his shop. On this statement an order was passed in presence of the learned counsel. The counsel for the plaintiff also conceded to deletion of the name of the defendant No.1. Two days after passing of this order, the counsel for the plaintiff approached the Court and stated that she had not given her consent for the deletion of defendant No.1 name and perhaps her consent has been mentioned by mistake. On Court motion, I issued notice to the counsel for plaintiff and defendant No.1 to appear today. Mr. Saleem Ghulam Hussain learned counsel for defendant No.1 reiterated and fully confirms that the plaintiff's counsel extended her no-objection for the deletion of the name of defendant No.1 and this is very unfortunate that after passing the order, she is denying her…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492