| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1971 SLG 125 1971 SLD 125 1971 SCMR 94 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 5-D of 1970, decision dated: 15th June 1970. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of East Pakistan Dacca, dated the 4th December 1969, in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 442 of 1969)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J. AND M. R. KHAN, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 5-D of 1970, decision dated: 15th June 1970. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of East Pakistan Dacca, dated the 4th December 1969, in Appeal from Appellate Decree No. 442 of 1969)
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J. AND M. R. KHAN, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MD. ANWARULLAH MAZUMDAR
VS
TAMINA BIBI AND 5 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 114-Presumpti,m-Document bearing a particular date-No conclusive presumption can be drawn as to its execution on that particular date. (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3)-Issue clearly raised and evidence led on question agitated-Courts of fact deciding on evidence that certain document was ante-dated-Contention that lower Courts were wrong in taking such view-Courts of fact, held, committed no illegality in arriving at decision, in circumstances. (c) Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3)-Contention that finding of Courts below on question of fact even though concurrent yet, being based on misreading of evidence, merited interference by Supreme Court-No evidence being annexed to or quoted in petition for special leave, Court, held, not in position to discover any such misreading from mere perusal of s. (d) Burden of proof-Contention that onus of proof was misplaced on petitioner-Evidence having been led by both parties, question, held, retains no importance-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 58(3). (e) Proof-Petitioner failing to establish his own case-Cannot succeed on weakness of defendants. D. C. Bhattacherjee, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Arninul Huq, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing : 15th June 1970. JUDGMENT HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C. J.-The petitioner brought a suit for specific performance of a contract of sale alleging that one Mst. Tamina Bibi, the predecessor-in-interest of the present respondents, had on the 14th of August 1963, entered into an agreement to sell to him the suit lands, measuring 5.84 acres, for a consideration of Rs. 3,500. After the execution of this agreement, the said Tamina Bibi fell seriously ill in the house of her son's father-in-law at Balakhal. As her condition was getting precarious, her son was sent to the petitioner with a request to make arrangements for immediate execution of the deed of sale in fulfilment of the agreement earlier entered into. The petitioner not being in a position to immediately procure the entire consideration money requested the said Tamina Bibi's son to purchase a stamp paper of Rs. 1-8-0 and to…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492