Case Details

Citation(s)
1970 SLG 95 1970 SLD 95 1970 PLD 402
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 4P of 1966, decided on 10th July 1970. dates of hearing : 18th and 19th December 1968 and .23rd April 1970. (On appeal from the judgment and order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, Peshawar, dated the 16th January 1964,
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI AND SAJJAD AHMAD, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

THE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER

VS

Syed BASHIR AHMAD

Law:

Section:

(a) University of Peshawar (Recruitment, Divc1pline, Punishment and Appeal) Service Rules------ ----r. 5--Interpretation-Retention of person in service after expiry of probationary period-Does not result in automatic confirmation (obiter). (b) Peshawar University Act, 1950-------- -----S. 45-Provision requiring every salaried officer and teacher to be appointed by written contract-Appointment, in absence of written contract, ineffective--Person cannot claim and clamour for confirmation if his very appointment, without written contract. Manzur Qadir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court instructed ah by M. A. Rahman, Advocate-on-Record for Appellants. Respondent in person. Dates of hearing : 18th and 19th December 1968 and .23rd April 1970. JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-This appeal, by special leave, has been brought by the University of Peshawar in the following circumstances:- On the 12th of February 1956, the respondent Mr. Bashir Ahmad was appointed by the University as a Reader in Law on probation for a period of one year, which expired on the 11th of February 1957, but was extended to the 31st of August 1957, by a decision taken by the Syndicate on the 28th of February 1957. After the expiry of the extended probationary period, the matter remained hanging until the 11th of October 1958, when the Syndicate took a decision to appoint the respondent as a Reader in the Department of Law on a contract basis for two years with effect from the 12th of October 1958. This decision was communicated to the respondent on the 28th of October 1958. The respondent protested that his employment on Am contract basis instead of his confirmation on the expiry of the probationary period which, under the relevant rules, could not last for more than two years in the maximum, was illegal and unfair. On the 3rd of May 1958, the Syndicate re-affirmed its decision of the 12th of October 1958, but proposed to re-examine the matter on the expiry of the contractual period. The respon­dent was at no time asked to execute any contract nor did he give assent to the new proposal. Curiously, the Syndicate thereafter, on the 5th of November 1960, unilaterally renewed the respon­dent's contract by…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492