| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 282 2007 SLD 282 2007 PTD 2218 (2007) 95 TAX 265 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
Sales Tax Appeal No.646/LB of 2004, decision dated: 20-11-2006, hearing DATE : 14-11-2006
MIAN MUHAMMAD, JAHANGIER, MEMBER, JUDICIAL AND HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ANEES, MEMBER TECHNICAL
Nemo for Appellant AND Dr. Kamal Azhar Minhas, D.R. and Saleem Akhtar Superintendent for
Respondent
Sales Tax Appeal No.646/LB of 2004, decision dated: 20-11-2006, hearing DATE : 14-11-2006
MIAN MUHAMMAD, JAHANGIER, MEMBER, JUDICIAL AND HAFIZ MUHAMMAD ANEES, MEMBER TECHNICAL
Nemo for Appellant AND Dr. Kamal Azhar Minhas, D.R. and Saleem Akhtar Superintendent for
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 23
(a) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990---Ss. 36, 2(37), 4, 7, 8(1)(a), 10 & 23---Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Refund against fake/flying invoices---Recovery of---Input tax adjustment was not admissible against invoices without physical supply of the goods; without use of the same in taxable supplies and further input tax must have been -paid against such goods---Invoices issued by the fake unit did not admit any possibility of adjustment being hollow from within---Such was nothing but a tax fraud as defined under S.2(37) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Under the Self-Assessment Scheme, it was the exclusive responsibility of the registered person to substantiate that he claimed and availed input tax adjustment against valid sales tax invoices---Input adjustment against fake/dying invoices being illegal, contention of the appellant was rejected by the Appellate Tribunal. (b) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.36---Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Limitation---Section 36(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 provides that where by any reason of some collusion or a deliberate act airy tax or charge had been erroneously refunded, the person liable to pay the amount of refund erroneously made shall be served with a notice within five years of the relevant date requiring him to show cause for the payment of the amount specified. (c) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.36---Recovery of tax not levied or short-levied or erroneously refunded---Object, form and substance of a notice---Effect---Object of every notice, including the notice contemplated by S.36 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 was to afford the opportunity of hearing and defence---Form of notice had not been prescribed either in he statute or in the rules---Even otherwise the substance was more important than form---Non-mention or wrong mention of section did not affect the nature of a document which was determined on the basis of its contents. (d) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 3(3), 7(1), 8(1)(a) & 36---Scope of tax---Liability to pay tax---Fake invoices---Provisions of S.3(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 were misconceived by contending…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492