Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 212 2009 SLD 212 2009 CLD 1498
Lahore High Court
C.M. No.2202 of 2009 in Writ Petition No.9518, decision dated: 16-07-2009
MIAN SAQIB NISAR, JUSTICE
Aitzaz Ahsan, Uzair Karamat Bhandari and Shahid Saeed for Petitioner. Basharat Qadir for
Respondent No. 4. Dr. Parvez Hassan for
Respondent No. 9.

LPG ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN

VS

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ISLAMABAD AND 8 OTHERS

Law: Competition Ordinance, 2007

Section: 30

(a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--Art. 199(1)(a)(i)(ii)---Constitutional petition---Territorial jurisdiction/concurrent jurisdiction of High Court-Principles-Respondents sought return of the constitutional petition on the ground that under Art.199(1)(a) of the Constitution, Lahore High Court did not have the jurisdiction to entertain the petition, primarily for the reason that all. the respondents (except a pro forma respondent) functioned at Islamabad; impugned notice had also been issued there, and therefore, it was the Islamabad High Court which alone had the territorial jurisdiction in the matter---Law and principles on the point of territorial jurisdiction/ concurrent jurisdiction of High Court recapitulated with illustrations. The following is the law and principles on the point of territorial jurisdiction/concurrent jurisdiction of High Court:-- (a) The Federal Government or any body politic or a corporation or a statutory authority having exclusive residence or location at Islamabad with no office at any other place in any of the Provinces, shall still be deemed to function all over the country. (b) If such Government, body or authority passes any order or initiates an action at Islamabad, but it affects the "aggrieved party" at the place other than the Federal Capital, such party shall have a cause of action to agitate about his grievance within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court in which said order/action has affected him. (c) This shall be more so in cases where a party is aggrieved or a legislative instrument (including any rules, etc.) on the ground of its being ultra vires, because the cause to sue against that law shall accrue to a person at the place where his rights have been affected. For example, if a law is challenged on the ground that it is confiscatory in nature, violative of the fundamental rights to property; profession, association etc. and any curb has been placed upon such a right by a law enforced at Islamabad, besides there, it can also be challenged within the jurisdiction of the High Court, where the right is likely to be affected. In this context, illustrations can be given, that if some duty/tax has been. imposed…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492