Case Details

Citation(s)
1970 SLG 791 1970 SLD 791 1970 PCRLJ 980
Sindh High Court
Criminal Revision No. 91 of 1969, 13th October, 1969
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Ali Imam

VS

Sr. Ghulam Hussain

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Revisional Jurisdiction, Notice, Maintain, High Court, Order, Maintainability, Procedure, Objections, Manager, Jurisdiction, Offences, Premises, Competency, Proceedings, Disposal, Orders, Without Jurisdiction, Rioting, Petition, Commercial Employment, Magistrate, Prostitution, Guilty Result: Petition dismissed JUDGMENT Applicant Ali imam has questioned the correctness of the order dated 27th May 1969, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi and the order dated 17th May 1969, of the learned Additional City Magistrate, Mr. Ghulam Nabi Kasimani, by which he ordered the eviction of the appellant under section 16(3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. 2. The relevant facts necessary for the disposal of this revision are these. The applicant was employed as a diesal machanic in the cement factory which is run by the Pakistan Progressive Cement Industries Limited, Karachi. He worked in that capacity from 27-12-63 till 13-3-67, on which date his services were terminated as he was found guilty on charges of rioting and disorderly behaviour. He was called upon to vacate the quarter (No. A. F/12) which is situate within the factory premises at Shanti Nagar. This quarter was provided to the applicant by his employer. The applicant refused to vacate the quarter with, the result that the manager of his ex-employer filed a complaint under section 16(2) of the said Ordinance for his eviction before Mr. Ghulam Nabi F. Kasimani, Additional City Magistrate, Karachi. 3. Notice of this complaint was issued to the applicant. He appeared before the learned Magistrate on 30th July 1968, and took a preliminary objection that the learned Magistrate had no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as the Ordinance was not retrospective and could not cover his case. This preliminary objection was repelled by the learned Magistrate by his order dated 16th September 1968. At the time of the disposal of this complaint, the applicant again took this objection as well as others in regard to the competency of the complaint which are summed up in para. 8, of the order. The learned Magistrate considered these…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492