| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1980 2007 SLD 1980 2007 PLC 585 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos.1919 to 1924 of 2002, decision dated: 15-11-2005. (On appeal from the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, dated 12-7-2002 passed in Appeals Nos.580, 668, 841 of 2000).
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI AND NASIR-UL-MULK, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Civil Appeals Nos.1919 to 1924 of 2002, decision dated: 15-11-2005. (On appeal from the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, dated 12-7-2002 passed in Appeals Nos.580, 668, 841 of 2000).
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI AND NASIR-UL-MULK, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Agricultural Department, Lahore and another
VS
SHAHID PERVIZ and others PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Agricultural Department, Lahore and another vs SHAHID PERVIZ and others
Law:
Section:
Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1999-------Rr. 3(b) & 4(1)(b)(v)---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)---Dismissal from service, reduction in time scale by three stages and recovery of embezzled amount---Fraudulent withdrawal of G.P. Fund advances on basis of fake vouchers by Cashier in connivance with civil servants, charge of---Service Tribunal in appeal reinstated civil servants in service, but maintained penalty of recovery of amount and reduced penalty of reduction in time scale by one stage---Plea that penalty awarded to civil servants was not proper as Cashier through his affidavit had taken responsibility of fraudulent withdrawal of such amount---Validity---Civil servants without proper verification and vigilance had put their signatures on such vouchers---Civil servants being responsible officials were required to be extra vigilant in such sensitive matters and were not supposed to put signatures on vouchers without verification of sanction for payment---Such admission of Cashier would not absolve civil servants from their responsibility of taking proper care and vigilance in checking bills, so that no mischief could be done by Cashier---Charge against civil servants was only that of negligence as they were neither party to such fraud nor beneficiary of transaction---Recovery of financial loss caused to Government by fraud of Cashier would not be proper from civil servants---Supreme Court partly accepted appeal by setting aside penalty of recovery of amount while maintaining penalty of reduction in time scale. Syed Sajjad Hussain Shah, A.A.-G. and Muhammad Hussain Naqshbandi, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellants (in C.As. Nos.1919-1921, of 2002 and C.As. Nos.1922 -1924 of 2002). Muhammad Hussain Naqshbandi, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents (in C.As. Nos.1919-1921 of 2002). Syed Sajjad Hussain Shah, A.A.-G. for Respondents (in C.As. Nos.1922-1924 of 2002). Date of hearing: 15th November, 2005. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ABBASI, J.--- These connected civil appeals have arisen out of a common judgment, dated 12-7-2002 passed by the Punjab Service Tribunal whereby the separate appeal filed by the appellants against…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492