| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1970 SLG 768 1970 SLD 768 (1970) 21 TAX 75 1970 PTD 76 |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
I.T.A. Nos. 151, 152 and 153 of 1968-69 (Assessment years 1964-65 to 1966-68), decided on 20.3.1970
MUHAMMAD SUBHAN CHOWDHURY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHAH ABDUR RASHID, JUDICIAL MEMBER
S. M. Anwar, Advocate, for the appellant, Abdul Hamid, PTS., D.R., for the
Respondent
I.T.A. Nos. 151, 152 and 153 of 1968-69 (Assessment years 1964-65 to 1966-68), decided on 20.3.1970
MUHAMMAD SUBHAN CHOWDHURY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHAH ABDUR RASHID, JUDICIAL MEMBER
S. M. Anwar, Advocate, for the appellant, Abdul Hamid, PTS., D.R., for the
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Income Tax Act, 1922
Section: 10(2)(iii),19(2)(iii),10(2)(xvi),10(2)(x v)
Law: Muhammadan Law
Section: 150
Law: Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Section: 123
Income-tax Act, 1922 -- Sections 10(2)(iii), 10(2)(xvi) -- Interest -- Borrowed capital -- Business expenditure -- Partnership consisting of father and son -- Gift by father out of his share capital to minor and major grandsons and wife -- Amounts gifted debited and credited in account books but remained part of capital of firm -- Gifts, whether valid under Muhammadan Law -- Held yes -- Deposits in the name of donees -- Whether capital borrowed -- Held no -- Interest on deposits, whether admissible under clause (xvi) and not clause (iii) -- Held yes -- Business expenditure -- Credits and deposits remaining with assessee and used for purpose of assessee's business -- Interest on such amount -- Held, expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for assessee's business and assessee entitled to its deduction -- Muhammadan Law -- Gift -- Essentials to validity of -- Provision of section 123 does not apply to a gift under Muhammadan Law -- Acceptance of such gift in writing by donee not essential - Corresponding Sections: Income-tax Ordinance, 1979 -- Sections 23(l)(v), 23(l)(xvii) - ORDER The order was passed by MUHAMMAD SUBHAN CHOWDHURY, Accountant Member.---These three appeals arise out of the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, on 6.5.1968. They relate to the charge years 1964-65, 1965-66 and 1966-67. The short question raised in all the three appeals is as to whether the Income-tax Officer was justified to disallow the interest purported to be paid and credited to the accounts of the wife and three minor grandsons of a partner of the appellant firm. 2. The facts leading to these appeals are that the appellant firm styled Mr. A and S was constituted with effect from the 1st of August, 1962, with three partners, namely, Mr. A his son B.A. and grandson C.B. having half the share and the other two having l/4th share each of the profits or losses in the firm in proportion to their capital contributions. Earlier right from the assessment year 1949-50 upto the assessment year 1962-63 the business of the firm mainly in Cigarette Agency was carried on in partnership between the father and son viz, A and B. On the first day of April, 1962 B.A…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492