Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 1494 2007 SLD 1494 2007 SCMR 1825
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition- No.504-L of 2006, decision dated: 28-08-2007. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 18-5-2006 passed by Lahore High Court, Lahore, in Criminal Appeal No.1938 of 2000)
FALAK SHER, TASSADUQ HUSSAIN, JILLANI AND CH. IJAZ AHMED, JJ
Ch. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Alamgir, A.P.G., Punjab for the
Respondents

FARMAN AHMED

VS

MUHAMMAD INAYAT and others

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302/148/149---Reappraisal of evidence---First Information Report, delay of 17 hours in lodging of---Distance between police station and place of occurrence was ten (10) miles---Registration of F.I.R. on basis of written complaint disclosed presence of two other eye-witnesses at the spot along with complainant---Incident was not reported to police by any of those eye-witnesses before filing of written complaint---Delay of 17 hours in lodging F.I.R. was not explained by complainant---Effect---Such delay had provided sufficient time to complainant for deliberation and consultation to fabricate story---Possibility could not be ruled out qua false implication of accused---Such unexplained delay would lead to inference that occurrence was un-witnessed. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302/148/149---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.46---Reappraisal of evidence---Conviction of -Petitioner and acquittal of six co-accused on basis of same evidence---Validity---F.I.R. contained general allegations against all accused---Registration of F.I.R. with delay of 17 days on basis of written, complaint disclosed presence of two other eye-witnesses at the spot along with complainant---Incident had not been reported to police by any other eye-witness before filing of written complaint---Complainant had not explained such delay, which had provided him sufficient time of deliberation and consultation to fabricate story---Possibility could not be ruled out qua false implication of -Petitioner---Such unexplained delay would lead to inference that occurrence was un-witnessed---Dying declaration of deceased was in conflict with report of doctor---No independent evidence was available on record to connect -Petitioner with commission of offence---Conviction and sentence of -Petitioner was set aside in circumstances. Ghulam Muhammad's case PLD 1975 SC 588; Sheral alias Sher Muhammad's case -1999 SCMR 697; Ata Muhammad's case 1995 SCMR 599; Faiz Bakhsh's case PLD 1959 PC 24; Nadia's case 42 Cr.LJ 53; Muhammad's case PLD 1954 FC 84; Sher Bahadar's case 1972 SCMR 651 and Muhammad Afsar's case PLD 1954 FC 171 rel. (c) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492