Case Details

Citation(s)
2003 SLG 165 2003 SLD 165 2003 PTD 1780 (2004) 89 TAX 155
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No.2331 of 2001, decision dated: 17-12-2002
NASIM SIKANDAR, J
Asghar Ahmad Kharal for Petitioner. Muhammad Ilyas Khan for
Respondent.

Dr. M.D. YOUCHI

VS

ACIT CIRCLE20, COMPANIES Zone-I, LAHORE

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Section: 59,61,62

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)----Ss. 59, 61 & 62---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Constitutional petition---Framing final assessment order during currency of injunctive order---Petitioner challenged order of selection of his case for detailed scrutiny---High Court while adjourning hearing to 12-3-2001 directed respondent not to pass final order in the meanwhile--Case thereafter came up for hearing on 19-4-2001, but was adjourned for a date in office---Assessing Officer on 30-6-2001 framed final assessment---Validity---Interpretation of Assessing Officer that injunctive order remained in currency only till 12-3-2001 was not acceptable---Being a case of an individual, drawing income from salary, there was no urgency in the case---Framing of final assessment order before expiry of Constitutional petition fixed by Art. 199 of the Constitution was, thus, an exercise in futility---High Court set aside assessment order framed under S.62 of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. (b) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----Ss. 59 & 61---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Self-assessment---Selection of case for detailed scrutiny---Validity---Revenue could not show exact reason for denying concession of Self-Assessment Scheme to petitioner---After issuance of Self-Assessment Scheme for year 1998-99, Central Board of Revenue had issued Circular No. 16 of 1998 specifying certain categories of assessees whose cases were to be selected for special audit---Issuance of such Circular almost 5/6 months after. issuance of Self-Assessment Scheme was totally unjustified as same was an attempt to trap unwary assessees---All categories of assessees given in such Circular ought to have, been informed- well before filing of return under Self-Assessment Scheme that they would not be allowed to avail concession---Issuance of such Circular nullified part of the Scheme---Case of petitioner had been taken up against Scheme, which was illegal exercise of discretion vested in Revenue---High Court accepted Constitutional petition and declared impugned order to be illegal. ORDER Through this Constitutional Petition,. the petitioner, an…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492