| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 1795 2008 SLD 1795 2008 SCMR 1221 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No.402 of 2002, decision dated: 4-04-2008.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur, dated 21-3-2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No.20 of 2000)
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, C.J., IJAZ-UL-HASSAN KHAN AND CH. EJAZ YOUSAF, JJ
Raja Muhammad Ibrahim Satti, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellants. Ms. Yasmin Sehgal D.P.G. for the State.
Criminal Appeal No.402 of 2002, decision dated: 4-04-2008.(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahawalpur, dated 21-3-2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No.20 of 2000)
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, C.J., IJAZ-UL-HASSAN KHAN AND CH. EJAZ YOUSAF, JJ
Raja Muhammad Ibrahim Satti, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellants. Ms. Yasmin Sehgal D.P.G. for the State.
GHULAM QADIR and 2 others
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---S. 161---Belated statements of witnesses---Effect---Belated examination of a witness by police may not be fatal to prosecution but where delay is unexplained, accused has not been named in F.I.R. and circumstances justify that open F.I.R. and delay have purposely been manoeuvred to name accused later, such managed delay and gaps adversely affected prosecution case. Mehmood Ahmad v. The State 1995 SCMR 127 rel. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 324/396/449/148/149----Conviction---Injured witness, non¬appearance---Effect---If injured witness himself does not appear to charge an accused for his injury and court is not satisfied with his disability or incompetence or reasons for not appearing then conviction cannot be recorded on the basis of other evidence under Qisas. Asghar Ali alias Sabah v. The State 1992 SCMR 2088 rel. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 324/396/449/148/149---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXII of 1997), S.7---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art.22---Reappraisal of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Identification parade---Infirmities and illegalities---Role played by each accused, non-describing of---One accused was acquitted by Trial Court, while three were convicted and sentenced to death, which sentence was maintained by High Court---Validity---Proceedings of identification parade where accused were picked up without describing role played by them in crime, suffered from illegalities and infirmities rendering it completely unreliable having no evidentiary value---Possibility that police had got accused identified by witnesses prior to identification parade could not be excluded---Supreme Court, while giving benefit of doubt to accused, set aside convictions and sentences recorded by Trial Court and maintained by High Court and accused were acquitted of the charge. Khadim Hussain v. The State 1985 SCMR 721 and Lal Singh v. Crown 1924 ILR 51 Lah. 396 ref. (d) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 324/396/449/148/149---Reappraisal of evidence--Medical evidence--Scope--Medical evidence may confirm ocular evidence with regard to receipt of injuries, nature of injuries, kinds of weapon used in occurrence but it…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492