| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1970 SLG 69 1970 SLD 69 1970 PLD 224 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1967, decision dated: 17th March 1970. dates of hearing : 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th February 1970
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI SAJJAD AHMAD AND WAHIDUDDIN AHMAD, JJ
Marzoor Qadir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Aftab Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Muhammad Sardar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Mahmood Ali Qasuri, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Aziz Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court with
Criminal Appeal No. 31 of 1967, decision dated: 17th March 1970. dates of hearing : 10th, 11th, 12th and 13th February 1970
HAMOODUR RAHMAN, C.J., MUHAMMAD YAQUB ALI SAJJAD AHMAD AND WAHIDUDDIN AHMAD, JJ
Marzoor Qadir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Aftab Farrukh, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Muhammad Sardar Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Mahmood Ali Qasuri, Senior Advocate Supreme Court (Aziz Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court with
SIKANDAR HAYAT
VS
(1) ATA, (2) WARYAM, (3) NOORA, (4) HASHMAT, (5) AKBAR AND (6) THE STATE
Law:
Section:
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 240, 248, 333, 421, 422, 423 & 494 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts. 58 & 61 and Supreme Court Rules, O. X VI, rr. 1 & 2 & O. XXIII, r. 13-Criminal appeal-Whether can be withdrawn Distinction between right to withdraw a civil appeal and to abandon a criminal appeal-Appeal by complainant, by special leave, against acquittal by High Court-Appellant does not have right to abandon appeal at his will-Such a course, held, opposed to law public policy and unwarranted by rules and practice of Court-Application for withdrawal of appeal dismissed. The question which arose in the instant case was up to what stage the right to withdraw an appeal lasts and whether or not the power acquired by the Court to determine the correctness of the order of acquittal impinges on that right. It was urged that, in principle, there is no distinction between the right to withdraw a civil appeal and to abandon a criminal appeal: Held, a civil appeal may be withdrawn at the will of the person who brought the appeal for a civil proceeding has for its object the recovery of money and other property or the enforcement of a right for the advantage of the person suing. The duty of the Court to adjudicate upon correctness of the , decree or order passed by the subordinate Court is, therefore, put to an end as soon as the person suing abandons his claim. However, a criminal proceeding has for its object the punishment of a public offence. The difference in the nature of civil and criminal proceedings is evident. One is for personal advantage of the person suing. He may, therefore, retract at any stage and abandon its claim without the consent of the Court. Such a course is not opposed to public policy. The other proceeding is not for personal advantage of the complainant. He does not come to Court to receive something in a criminal proceeding which he may decline to receive at his own will. Like the State he acts "standing forward as prosecutor on behalf of the subject on public grounds". To say that a complainant in criminal proceedings has a right to prosecute a person accused of a public offence is, therefore, not a…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492