| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1952 SLG 19 1952 SLD 19 1952 PLD 560 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal, Miscellaneous No. 380 of 1949, decided on 29th November, 1949
MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND MUHAMMAD, JAN, JJ
Chaudhari Muhammad Sharif, Assistant to the Advocate-General for Petitioner.
Respondents, in person under police custody
Criminal, Miscellaneous No. 380 of 1949, decided on 29th November, 1949
MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND MUHAMMAD, JAN, JJ
Chaudhari Muhammad Sharif, Assistant to the Advocate-General for Petitioner.
Respondents, in person under police custody
THE CROWN
VS
SAIDU and anothers
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 368,369,374,376,423
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)------- ----Ss. 368, 369, 374, 376 and 423-Sessions Judge passed sentence of death under S. 302 of Penal Code-But he did not direct that convict be hanged by neck till he was dead-High Court confirmed sentence-High Court has no power to correct error of Sessions Judge. The confirmation by the High Court under section 376, Criminal P. C., would mean only this : that the death sentence awarded by the trial Court was, in the view of the High Court, an appropriate sentence and should be allowed to stand. In confirming the sentence of death, it is nowhere prescribed that the High Court should clearly state that the sentence was to be executed by hanging as prescribed in the Code. The High Court has no special powers under Letters Patent to alter the . The , therefore, cannot be altered or reviewed. It is only where some "clerical error" is to be corrected, that it might be done. It is also doubtful whether the correction which is required to be made would be a mere "clerical error". It was not a mistake or slip made in the preparation or the copying of the . So far as the of the High Court is concerned, it was never the intention nor was it at all necessary that in dismissing the appeal and confirming the sentence of death the mariner of the execution of the death sentence in accordance with section 368, Criminal P. C., should have been indicated. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD SHARIF, J.-This is a petition by the Advocate-General, Punjab, under section 369, Criminal P. C., for the correction of an alleged "clerical error". On the 15th June 1948, one Chiragh, a Pakistani Christian, was killed. Three persons, i.e., Saidu, Makhan and Shahru were tried for the murder by the learned Sessions Judge, Lahore. By his order of 12th January 1949, he gave the benefit of doubt to Shahru and convicted Saidu and Makhan under section 302, Indian P. C., and sentenced each of them to death subject to confirmation by the High Court. It was not mentioned, as required by section 368 of the Criminal P. C., that he "be hanged by the neck till he is dead". The death sentence was sent up for confirmation to this Court under section 374 and an appeal against…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492