| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 1834 2008 SLD 1834 2008 SCMR 1369 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.466 of 2008, decision dated: 26-05-2008.(On appeal from the judgment, dated 23-1-2008 passed by Federal Service Tribunal in Appeal No.397(R) of 2007)
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, C.J., IJAZ-UL-HASSAN KHAN AND CH. EJAZ YOUSAF, JJ
Abdul Rehman Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court with Arshad Ali Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Qamar Zaman, Clerk, Litigation Branch for
Respondents
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.466 of 2008, decision dated: 26-05-2008.(On appeal from the judgment, dated 23-1-2008 passed by Federal Service Tribunal in Appeal No.397(R) of 2007)
ABDUL HAMEED DOGAR, C.J., IJAZ-UL-HASSAN KHAN AND CH. EJAZ YOUSAF, JJ
Abdul Rehman Siddiqui, Advocate Supreme Court with Arshad Ali Chaudhry, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Qamar Zaman, Clerk, Litigation Branch for
Respondents
NASEEB KHAN
VS
DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE and another
Law:
Section:
Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (XVII of 2000)---S. 5---Misconduct---Dismissal from service---Non-holding of departmental Enquiry---Violation of principles of natural justice---Effect---Held, in case of imposing a major penalty, the principles of natural justice required that a regular enquiry was to be conducted in the matter and opportunity of defence and personal hearing was to be provided to the civil servant proceeded against, otherwise civil servant would be condemned unheard and major penalty of dismissal from service would be imposed upon him without adopting the required mandatory procedure, resulting in manifest injustice. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation v. Ms. Shaista Naheed 2004 SCMR 316 and Inspector-General of Police, Karachi and 2 others v. Shafqat Mehmood 2003 SCMR 2007 ref. JUDGMENT IJAZ-UL-HASSAN KHAN, J.--- Through instant petition under Article 212(3) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, Naseeb Khan, petitioner, seeks leave against judgment, dated 23-1-2008 of learned Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, whereby appeal of the petitioner, challenging his dismissal from service, has been dismissed, in limine, being barred by time. 2. Precisely stated facts of the case as gathered from the record are, that petitioner joined service of respondent-Department as Junior Commercial Assistant Booking (BS-5) on 26-3-1998 and served as such for 14 years. On 10-11-2001 due to demise of his wife, petitioner proceeded on leave. Petitioner was on leave when his father expired on 31-12-2001. According to the petitioner on 26-5-2002, he reported back but he was not allowed to resume duty and was issued a show-cause notice along with statement of allegations for remaining absent from duty without prior permission. The petitioner preferred representation/appeal which was rejected vide order, dated 13-5-2006. Feeling aggrieved, petitioner filed appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad which has been dismissed in limine, as stated above vide judgment impugned herein. 3. Mr. Abdur Rehman Siddiqui, learned Advocate, appearing for the petitioner argued that learned Tribunal has overlooked the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492