| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 1584 2008 SLD 1584 2008 SCMR 360 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No.2643-L of 2002, decision dated: 30-06-2004.(On appeal from the judgment dated 14-5-2002 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench passed in R.S.A. No.134 of 1987)
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY AND FALAK SHER, JJ
Ch. Shaukat Ali Saqib, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
Civil Petition No.2643-L of 2002, decision dated: 30-06-2004.(On appeal from the judgment dated 14-5-2002 of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench passed in R.S.A. No.134 of 1987)
KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY AND FALAK SHER, JJ
Ch. Shaukat Ali Saqib, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents
Mst. NOOR KHATOON through L.Rs.
VS
KABIR KHAN and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)---S. 54---Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Ss.17 & 49---West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S.42---Sale of agricultural land through mutation sanctioned in April, 1974 on the basis of statements of sellers made before Patwari and Revenue Officer---Validity---Such oral sale would not be affected by Notification of Government of Punjab dated 30-12-1974 making applicable provisions of S.54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 to sale of agricultural land. JUDGMENT KHALIL-UR-REHMAN RAMDAY, J.---The present respondents filed a suit claiming therein that Mst. Noor Khatoon predecessors-in-interest of the petitioners mentioned at No.1 and her brother Ghulam Muhammad had sold the suit-land to them and after receiving the sale consideration of Rs.2,495 handed over possession of the same to them; that Mutation No.1555 was entered on 13-4-1974 on the statement of the said sellers regarding the said sale; that on 16-4-1974 the said sellers appeared before the Revenue Officer and again made a statement that they had sold the land in question to the plaintiffs and had received the sale price; that the plaintiffs were then asked to deposit District Council Fee which they deposited on 8-6-1974 and that when the said mutation came up for final attestation on 23-5-1975 it was declared by the Assistant Collector that even the sales of agricultural land were to be made through registered sale-deed and since the sale in question was an oral sale, therefore, the mutation could not be sanctioned. This led the plaintiffs to the Civil Court seeking a declaration that they were owners in possession of the land in question and that the order of the Assistant Collector dated 23-5-1975 refusing the sanctioning of the above-mentioned mutation was illegal. 2. This suit was decreed by a learned Civil Judge at Alipur, through a judgment, dated 26-10-1986 but on appeal filed by the defendants the said judgment and decree was set aside and the suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed through a judgment dated 5-7-1987. The…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492