Case Details

Citation(s)
2004 SLG 122 2004 SLD 122 2004 PTD 199
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
I. T. A. No. 2549/LB of 2002, decision dated: 23rd August, 2003 hearing DATE : 23rd August, 2003
ZAFAR ALI THAHEEM, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND, JAVED TAHIR BUTT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ahmad Kamal, D.R. for Appellant Nemo for
Respondent

Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411

Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435

Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979

Section: 59(1),62,FirstSched.,PartI

Law: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981

Section: R.20(2)

Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)---Ss.59(1), 62 & First Sched., Part I---Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1981, R.20(2)---Self-assessment---Senior citizen rebate-"Return of assessee was proceeded under normal law and the tax paid was less than the tax paid for the last year---First Appellate Authority annulled the assessment on the ground that assessee was entitled to rebate of 50% being senior citizen and tax was paid after deducting the said rebate--¬Validity---Order of First Appellate Authority did not suffer from any illegality ---Assessee being senior citizen was entitled to tai rebate and his return was qualified to be accepted under Self-Assessment Scheme---First Appellate Authority was justified in annulling the assessment made under S.62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979--¬Order of the First Appellate Authority was upheld by the Appellate Tribunal. ORDER JAVED TAHIR BUTT (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)----This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of, the CIT(A) agitating the annulment of the assessment completed under section 62 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979. 2. The DR is present for the Revenue while none appeared on behalf of the assessee,/respondent. Therefore, the appeal is decided ex parte on merits under rule 20(2) of the ITAT Rules, 1981. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the return filed under the Self Assessment Scheme declaring income of Rs.1,63,000 was proceeded under normal law as tax paid by the assessee was less than the tax paid for last year. The Assessing Officer in the absence of books of account and documentary evidence rejected the declared version and estimated sales at Rs.18,00,000 on which G. P. rate of 15% was applied and after allowing profit and loss account expenses at Rs.38,000, net income of the assessee was determined at Rs.2,32,000. In appeal, the CIT(A) after considering the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492