Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 1325 2009 SLD 1325 2009 PTD 330 (2008) 98 TAX 189

S.T.A. No.295/LB of 2005, decision dated: 15-01-2008, hearing DATE : 14-01-2008
ZAFAR UL MAJEED, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395


Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411

Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435

Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990

Section: 34

Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----S.34---S.R.O. 1349(I)/99, dated 17-12-1999---S.R.O. 463(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007---S.R.O. 999(I)/2007, dated 29-9-2007---Default surcharge---Amnesty---Levy of additional tax and penalty for late payment---Demand was challenged on the ground that such liability was discharged by depositing 25% of the additional tax and penalty in terms of amnesty S.R.O. 1349(I)/99, dated 17-12-1999---Department contended that appellant was not entitled to the benefit under S.R.O. 1349(I)/99, dated 17-12-1999 as entire principal liability was not discharged before 31-1-2000 i.e. cut-off date---Validity---Held, on the date of hearing as on 14-1-2008, Appellate Tribunal observed that government had waived off whole of the amount of default surcharge (additional tax) and penalties vide S.R.O. 463(I)/2007, dated 9-6-2007 as amended vide S.R.O. 999(I)/2007, dated 29-9-2007 payable by a person provided the principal amount was paid by 30-6-2007 or had already been paid at the time of issuance of such notification---In the present case, entire principal amount had been paid by 11-2-2000 and, as such, the demand of additional tax and penalty stood remitted in terms of such notification---Appeal was accepted by the Appellate Tribunal and order was set aside. JUDGMENT ZAFAR UL MAJEED, MEMBER (TECHNICAL).---This appeal has been filed by Messrs Pak Electron Ltd., Lahore (the appellant herein) against Order-in-Original No.74 of 2000, dated 16-3-2000 passed by the Additional Collector, Sales Tax, Lahore. 2. Briefly the facts leading upto this appeal are that the appellant did not pay its sales tax liability of Rs.11,394,747 relating to the tax period December, 1999 by the due date i.e., 15th January, 2000. The appellant, however, deposited an amount of Rs.11,750,762 subsequently on the following dates:-- (i) Rs.9,761,250 on…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492