| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1970 SLG 506 1970 SLD 506 (1970) 77 ITR 785 |
Madras High Court
WRIT PETITION No. 1787 OF 1966, MARCH 24, 1970
RAMAPRASADA RAO AND RAMANUJAM, JJ
K. Srinivasan and K.C. Rajappa for the Petitioner. V. Balasubrahmanyan and J. Jayaraman for the
Respondent
WRIT PETITION No. 1787 OF 1966, MARCH 24, 1970
RAMAPRASADA RAO AND RAMANUJAM, JJ
K. Srinivasan and K.C. Rajappa for the Petitioner. V. Balasubrahmanyan and J. Jayaraman for the
Respondent
M. Mariappa Gounder
v.
Income Tax Officer
Law:
Section:
Section 178(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Company in liquidation - Assessment year 1963-64 - Petitioner was appointed liquidator on 28-10-1963 - He sent on 17-11-1963, a letter to ITO with return etc., making it clear that he was addressing ITO in his capacity as liquidator - On 13-12-1963 he informed that in view of loss there were no income-tax arrears and he proposed to distribute funds to shareholders - Loss return was accepted by ITO on 19-1-1965 - However, on 17-4-1966 Commissioner revised assessment order raising tax liability, which was sought to be recovered from liquidator personally under section 178(4), as amended from 1-4-1965 - Whether letter dated 17-11-1963 could be construed as a notice of appointment as liquidator - Held, yes - Whether amended provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) could not apply since liquidator had been appointed in 1962 and notice of appointment, had been duly and substantially given on 17-11-1963 - Held, yes - Whether since ITO did not notify petitioner disputed amount of tax within three months from 17-11-1963, he could not be held personally liable for amount in dispute brought to tax by Commissioner in year 1966 - Held, yes FACTS The company H went into voluntary liquidation and the petitioner was appointed on 28-10-1963, as liquidator. On 17-11-1963, the petitioner in his capacity as liquidator submitted a letter to Income-tax Officer a return enclosing the balance-sheet and profit and loss account for the assessment year 1963-64. The said letter made it clear that he was addressing the Income-tax Officer in his capacity as liquidator. In letter dated 13-12-1963, the Income-tax Officer was told that due to loss there were no income-tax arrears, that income-tax advance and the contingent liability for income-tax were taken over by the Syndicate Bank and that in view of the fact that sufficient provision to meet the contingent liability of income-tax having been made already, he was proposing to distribute the funds to the shareholders. The assessment order was passed on 19-1-1965, accepting the petitioner's return of loss. But the said assessment was, revised by the Commissioner on 7-4-1966, and this resulted in theβ¦
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492