| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2009 SLG 1482 2009 SLD 1482 2009 PTD 799 2010 PTCL 89 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 1477 to 1484 of 2000, decision dated: 7-11-2008. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 23-5-2000 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in I.T.As. Nos.297, 303, 311, 472 of 1999, 439 of 199.8, 501, 511 and 508 of 2000)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, SYED SAKHI HUSSAIN BOKHARI AND SHEIKH HAKIM ALI, JJ
M. Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court, M. Bilal, Mumtaz A. Sheikh, Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Zia Haider Rizvi, Kh. Ibrar Majal, Iqbal Hashmi, M.S. Khattak
Civil Appeals Nos. 1477 to 1484 of 2000, decision dated: 7-11-2008. (On appeal from the judgment, dated 23-5-2000 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in I.T.As. Nos.297, 303, 311, 472 of 1999, 439 of 199.8, 501, 511 and 508 of 2000)
SARDAR MUHAMMAD RAZA KHAN, SYED SAKHI HUSSAIN BOKHARI AND SHEIKH HAKIM ALI, JJ
M. Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court, M. Bilal, Mumtaz A. Sheikh, Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Zia Haider Rizvi, Kh. Ibrar Majal, Iqbal Hashmi, M.S. Khattak
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES Zone-II,
VS
Messrs CANTT. COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY and 7 others
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 2(16)(b),80B
Law: Cooperative Societies Act, 1925
Section: 23
Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)]......Sections 2(16)(b) & 80-B---Cooperative Societies Act (VII of 1925), S.23---Corporate body formed by or under any law---Scope---Cooperative society---Status---Interest/profit from bank deposits---Plea raised by cooperative societies was that they were not companies in terms of S.2(16)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, therefore, interest/ profit from bank deposits was covered by S.80--B of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Validity---Only those bodies corporate were covered under S.2 (16)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which were created by some law for the time being in force---Such were only those societies which were directly established, constituted and created by relevant statue itself---Body formed by private individuals and subsequently registered under some law was not a body formed under that law, rather it was a body formed otherwise but registered under law---Formation, creation and constitution of a body under law was therefore, altogether different from a body required merely to be registered under some law---Respondent societies were not creation of any law but whatever be their mode of creation, they were required to be registered with Registrar of Cooperative Societies under Cooperative Societies Act, 1925---Respondent societies were not covered by the definition of company as provided in S.2 (16)(b) of Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and could not be taxed as claimed by income tax authorities, therefore, Supreme Court upheld the passed by High Court---Appeal was dismissed. Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition, New Lexicon Webster's Dictionary, Words and Phrases Permanent Edition, Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, 5th Edition ref. M. Ilyas Khan, Advocate Supreme Court, M. Bilal, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Mumtaz A. Sheikh, Member Legal F.B.R. for Appellant (in all cases). Raja Abdul Ghafoor, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant (in C.A. No.1482 of 2000). Zia Haider Rizvi, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents (in C.As. Nos.1477 and 1478 of 2000). Kh. Ibrar Majal, Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents (in C.As. Nos.1479 and 1480 of 2000). Iqbal Hashmi, Advocate Supreme Court and M.S. Khattak, Advocate-on-Record…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492