| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2002 SLG 342 2002 SLD 342 2002 PTD 2133 (2003) 87 TAX 69 |
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
I.T.A. No. 1557/LB of 2000, decision dated: 18-04-2002, hearing DATE : 2-04-2002
RASHEED AHMAD SHEIKH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND, JAVED TAHIR BUTT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Azhar Ehsan Sheikh for Appellant. Javed ur Rehman, D.R. for
Respondent
I.T.A. No. 1557/LB of 2000, decision dated: 18-04-2002, hearing DATE : 2-04-2002
RASHEED AHMAD SHEIKH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND, JAVED TAHIR BUTT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Azhar Ehsan Sheikh for Appellant. Javed ur Rehman, D.R. for
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Section: 12,(18)
(a) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)----S.12(18)---Deemed income---Share deposit money---Treatment of share deposit money as loan---Amount admittedly had been shown as share deposit money and had not been claimed or shown as loan in the balance-sheet but in reality that may be a loan, the deeming provisions contained in S.12(18) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 were not attracted in such an eventuality---No law can be allowed to be circumvented by use of wrong expression or incorrect terminology because that would amount to allowing perpetual fraud on the law with impunity-- -Where two interpretations were equally possible, the one favourable to the subject was to be adopted- -Letter of law in taxing statute had to be interpreted in the sense it had been used and expressed-Terminology used as share deposit money in the balance-sheet could not take place that of a "loan" because the expression "loan" had always inherent characteristic to be repaid or returned after a certain or in some cases uncertain limit of time with or without interest---Provisions of S.12(18) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 were not attracted where the assessee had claimed or shown share deposit money in the balance-sheet-unless otherwise controverted by the department with unequivocal evidence: (b) Interpretation of statutes---- ---.-Two interpretations possible---Principles---No law can be allowed to be circumvented by use of wrong expression or incorrect terminology because that would amount to allowing perpetual fraud on the law with impunity---Where two interpretations were equally possible, the one favourable to the subject was to be adopted---Letter of law in taxing statute had to be interpreted in the sense it had been used and expressed. (c) Income Tax Ordinance (XXXI of 1979)--- ----S.12(18)---Deemed income---Share deposit money---Payment was made by the Directors of the company to the suppliers of goods for the creation of the assets of the company---Such amount was shown as share deposit money of the Directors in the balance-sheet---Assessing Officer treated the same as loan and addition was made under S.12(18) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979---Validity---Amount in…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492