Case Details

Citation(s)
2007 SLG 2040 2007 SLD 2040 2007 PLC 761
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeals Nos.41(L)(C.S.) to 50(L)(C.S.), 164(L)(C.S.) to 169(L)(C.S.), 55(P)(C.S.) to 84(P)(C.S.), 271(P)(C.S.), 328(L)(C.S.), 509(R)(C.S.), 510(R)(C.S.), 527(R)(C.S.) to 543(R)(C.S.) of 2001, 610(R)(C.S.), 611(R)(C.S.), and 612(R)(C.S.) of 2002 decided on
NAZAR MUHAMMAD SHAIKH AND HASSAN RAZA PASHA, MEMBERS

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others

VS

PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others vs PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. through Chairman and another

Law:

Section:

Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)-------S.9---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4---Promotion---Entitlement---Appellants were working as Telephone Operators (BPS-8) from different dates---Some of the appellants were Graduates and some intermediate and fulfilled conditions of experience to become eligible for promotion to BPS-11---One Telephone Operator having finally been promoted to BPS-11 through Court, appellants thereupon approached the department for considering them also for promotion in like manner---Claim of appellants having been rejected by the Authority, Appellants had filed appeal before Service Tribunal--Various Notifications issued with regard to promotion of employees of the Department, had provided rules with regard to promotion of employees---Rules provided that promotion could be allowed to Telephone Operator in BPS-8 if he was Matriculate with four years clean service or Intermediate with one year's service---Rules had allowed promotion as Telephone Operator in BPS-11 who were in BPS-8 & 10 provided they were Intermediate with four years unblemished service or Graduate with one year service---Said Rules had provided that posts of Telephone Operators in BPS-11 were available to Telephone Operators in entire Department whether they were working in Overseas Trunk Exchange or elsewhere---Department was directed to examine case of appellants who had the required qualification and experience to be considered for promotion to BPS-11 within specified period. 1996 SCMR 1185 ref. Farooq Awan for Appellants (in Appeals Nos.41 to 49 and 164 to 169(L)(C..S.) of 2001). Ilyas Monem for Appellants (in Appeals Nos.55 to 84(P)(C.S.) of 2001 and 271(P)(C.S.) of 2002 and 610 to 612(R)(C.S.) of 2002). Shaikh Khalid Hakim for Appellants (in Appeals Nos.509 and 510(R)(C.S.) of 2001). Shahzad Ahmad Malik for Appellants (in Appeals Nos.527 to 534(R(C.S.) of 2001). Muhammad Ramzan Khan for Appellant (in Appeal No.50(L)(C.S.) of 2001). Sardar Zakir Hussain for Respondents along with Mushtaq Ahmad, Assistant Director Engg.III, Legal, P.T.C.L., M.T.R. Multan (in Appeals Nos. 509, 510 and 610 to 612(R)(C.S.) of 2001). Tausif Asif for Respondents (in Appeals…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492