Case Details

Citation(s)
2004 SLG 798 2004 SLD 798 2004 PTCL 35
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
Customs Appeal Nos. K. 274, 275, 276 & 277/02/3765, decision dated: 11-06-2003
MS. YASMIN ABBASSEY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-III) MR. SAFDAR ALI, MEMBER (TECHNICAL-III)
Mr. Sohail Muzzafar, Advocate, Mr. Saeed Hasan, AC & Mr. Masood-ul-Hasan, PA.
Respondent by: Mr. Sardar Ali Javed, Consultant

THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PORT MUHAMMAD BIN QASIM, KARACHI

VS

M/S. NEW ALLIED ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD and others

Law: Customs Act, 1969

Section: 25

CUSTOMS ACT, 1969 (IV of 1969)---Section 25---The reason that the importers associated with the supplier, the subsequent method of valuation on the basis of identical or similar goods cannot be resorted to, the advice by the Valuation Department on request by the importer to release goods provisionally after 5% loading under Section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969 was proper.--The Respondent imported consignments of "LG" Brand Air Conditioners of various specifications. Whereas the Respondent being importers of LG Brand Air-conditioner in Pakistan, associated with the Supplier, therefore, the value could not be determined under sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 as provided in the proviso (d) thereof. Keeping in view the concrete evidences of identical goods of same LG Brand Air Conditioners of similar type and capacity imported from the same source of supply, the goods imported by the Respondent were held liable to be assessed under sub-section (5) and (6) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969. The Custom Staff also conducted a discrete market enquiry, which also substantiated that the assessable values ascertained by the staff are just equitable and correct. The matter was also referred by the Respondent to Valuation Department who advised the Department to assess the goods after 5% loading as it is established that the Importers are associated with the supplier but further investigation & verification is still required to ascertain the relationship as associated or related person. However, the goods were not released by the appellants who approached the Honourable High Court of Sind and Honourable High Court was pleased to pass orders for release of goods after detaining the goods equivalent to the alleged prices difference ascertained by the Collectorate of Port Qasim under Section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969 and Adjudicating Authority was directed to decide the case within six weeks. It is evident that the goods of the Respondents do not fall within any of the exceptions contained in clauses (a) to (d) to the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969. The appellants failed to prove the allegations charged in the…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492