Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 3300 2009 SLD 3300 2009 PCRLJ 300
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No.26 and Murder Reference No.67 of 2002, heard on 13th October, 2008.Date of hearing: 13th October, 2008.
Before Kazim Ali Malik and Rana Zahid Mahmood, JJ
Sahibzada Farooq Ali and Qazi Saddar-ud-Din Alvi for Appellants. Rai Muhammad Zahid, Vice Counsel for the Complainant. Zulfiqar Ali Sidhu, Addl. P.-G., Punjab for the State.

ZAFAR HUSSAIN and 4 others---Appellants

VERSUS

THE STATE----Respondent

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)/324/148/149

(a) Administration of justice--- ----Law does not recognize system of private revenge. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b)/324/148/149---Appreciation of evidence---Double murder---Description of injuries, failure to attribute---Quantum of sentence---Accused attacked complainant party in court room with sharp-edged weapons---Out of two deceased one suffered 22 injuries and the other sustained 24 sharp-edged weapon injuries on different parts of their bodies including face, forehead, abdomen and chest---Complainant also received sharp-edged weapon injuries at the hands of assailants---Trial Court convicted all accused persons under S.302(b), P.P.C. and sentenced them to death penalty---Plea raised by accused was that prosecution witnesses had specifically attributed each and every injury of deceased person---Validity---Way the deceased and prosecution witnesses were attacked, it was not possible for eye-witnesses including injured to attribute each and every injury of deceased person to -assailants specifically--All five accused actively participated in occurrence and caused Chhuri blows to deceased persons and injured complainant---Accused were caught red-handed with blood-stained Chhuries in Sessions Court premises---Mere fact that eye-witnesses could not attribute each and every injury of deceased persons to accused specifically would hardly benefit accused while determining quantum of sentence---Accused formed unlawful assembly which resulted in violence and, therefore, 'they all were convicted under S.148, P.P.C. and sentenced to three years imprisonment---All accused made murderous assault on complainant by causing sharp-edged weapon injuries on different parts of his body, therefore, all accused were convicted under Ss.324 & 149, P.P.C. and sentenced to five years imprisonment---High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction also maintained conviction and sentence awarded by Trial Court---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 342---Statement---Age of accused---Proof---Statement of accused without oath regarding his age cannot be and should not be accepted as conclusive proof of his age,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492