Case Details

Citation(s)
2009 SLG 1969 2009 SLD 1969 (2009) 311 ITR 401
Delhi High Court
IT APPEAL NO. 1473 OF 2006, OCTOBER 3, 2007
MADAN B. LOKUR AND DR. S. MURALIDHAR, JJ.

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395


Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 411

Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 435

Law:

Section:

[2008] 166 Taxman 161 (Delhi)/[2009] 311 ITR 401 (Delhi)/[2008] 219 CTR 308 (Delhi) [2008] 166 TAXMAN 161 (DELHI) HIGH COURT OF DELHI Commissioner of Income-tax * v. R.G. Scientific Enterprises (P.) Ltd. MADAN B. LOKUR AND DR. S. MURALIDHAR, JJ. IT APPEAL NO. 1473 OF 2006 OCTOBER 3, 2007 Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Bad debts - Assessment year 1995-96 - Two Directors had, on behalf of assessee-company, made down payment of Rs. 9 lakhs to one company 'K' for purchase of a premises for assessee - Later, they resigned and transaction for said purchase could not be completed - Since 'K' refused to return money, after waiting for three years, on advice of its auditors, assessee wrote off said amount as bad debt - Assessing Officer disallowed claim - Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed appeal filed by assessee by holding that since money was paid for purchase of a capital asset and after purchase would have been shown in balance sheet as such, said sum constituted a capital loss and not a business loss - Tribunal took view that since asset was in fact not purchased and any hope of money being recovered was lost, said sum constituted only a business loss and had to be allowed as such - Letter written by assessee to Assessing Officer revealed that amount had been advanced to 'K' for purchase of a capital asset for assessee - Whether conclusion arrived at by Tribunal that non-recovery of said sum was a business loss was contrary to assessee's letter which made position explicit that it was advanced for purchase of a capital asset - Held, yes - Whether, therefore Commissioner (Appeals) was justified - Held, yes CASE REFERRED TO CIT v. Abdullabhai Abdulkadar [1961] 41 ITR 545 (SC) [Para 5]. Ms. Sonia Mathur for the Appellant. Satyen Sethi for the Respondent. ORDER 1. In this appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), the revenue has challenged the dated 24-2-2006 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "F" ('Tribunal') in ITA No. 4045/Delhi/1999 for the assessment year 1995-96. 2. Admit. 3. The following question of law arises for consideration : "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492