| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2002 SLG 568 2002 SLD 568 2002 PTCL 597 2003 PTD 773 (2003) 88 TAX 41 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No. 1457 of 1999, decision dated: 30-11-2000
ZAHID KURBAN ALVI AND MUSHIR ALAM, JJ
Farough Naseem for Petitioner. Saleem Thepdawala and Akhlaque Ahmed for
Respondents. Syed Tariq Ali, Standing Counsel
Constitutional Petition No. 1457 of 1999, decision dated: 30-11-2000
ZAHID KURBAN ALVI AND MUSHIR ALAM, JJ
Farough Naseem for Petitioner. Saleem Thepdawala and Akhlaque Ahmed for
Respondents. Syed Tariq Ali, Standing Counsel
MATIARI SUGAR MILLS LTD.
VS
PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FINANCE and others
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 2(25),3(1A),14,19
(a) Interpretation of statutes--- -----Fiscal statutes---Such enactments have to be given their literal meaning---No inference can be made especially when none is required---If any inference is required, then same should be to the benefit of taxpayer. (b) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Ss. 2(25), 3(1-A), 14 & 19---Registered person---Further tax, levy of---Exception ---Proof---Registration compulsory under S.14 read with S.19 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990---Inference would be that tax would be liable and payable by those persons or companies, who are registered or liable to be registered---Recovery of further tax from persons other than a registered person under S.3(1-A) of the Act---Such provisions would enable same to persons falling within definition of S.2(25) of the Act--Assessee claiming exemption has to show that persons to whom taxable supply is made is registered or liable to be registered under the Act. ORDER ZAHID KURBAN ALVI, J.---Several petitions have been filed whereby the imposition of one per cent and 3% further tax under section 7(ii)(a) of the Finance Act, 1998 and section 16(2) of the Finance Act, 1999 is challenged. By these Acts the new tax was incorporated as section 3 (1-A) of the Sales Tax Act. This has been challenged as unConstitutional and without jurisdiction. The petitioner has made the following prayers:--- (i) declare 1% and 3% "further tax imposed by section 7(ii)(a) of the Finance Act, 1998 and section 16(2) of the Finance Act, 1999 by introducing the same as section 3(1-A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 and the latter to be un-Constitutional, unlawful, without jurisdiction, mala fide, void ab initio and of no legal effect: (ii) hold declare that the petitioner is not liable to pay the 1% and 3% "further tax" under section 3(1-A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990: (iii) direct the respondents to issue refunds and additional refunds alongwith mark-up till the date of payment of the amounts already recovered by the respondents from the petitioner as "further tax" under section 3(1-A) of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. (iv) pending disposal of the main petition restrain the respondents from recovering any "further tax" under section 3(1-A) of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492