| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1797 2007 SLD 1797 2007 PLC 105 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No.1276 of 2004, decision dated: 27-07-2005.
MUHAMMAD AFZAL, MEMBER-I
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Appeal No.1276 of 2004, decision dated: 27-07-2005.
MUHAMMAD AFZAL, MEMBER-I
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD ASLAM, A.S.-I.
VS
DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SHEIKHUPURA RANGE, LAHORE and 2 others MUHAMMAD ASLAM, A.S.-I. vs DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SHEIKHUPURA RANGE, LAHORE and 2 others
Law:
Section:
Punjab Civil Servants Act (XIII of 1974)-------S. 8---Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1974, R.22---Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.4---Promotion---Claim for ante-dated promotion---Ad hoc appointment---Appeal to Service Tribunal---Case of appellant for ante-dated promotion as A.S.-I. having finally been rejected by concerned Authority, appellant had filed appeal before Service Tribunal---Validity---Appeal deserved acceptance on the sole ground that none of the private respondents who were likely to be affected, had filed any objection---Position on merits was that, there being no concept of ad hoc promotion in the Police Rules, such promotion of appellant as A.S.-I. had to be considered as officiating promotion---As per Police Rules, a police official was to be confirmed from the date of officiating promotion on successful completion of probation---Nothing adverse was shown by the official respondents in the service record of appellant as to make him disentitled to confirmation from the date he was originally promoted as A.S.-I.---Late admission of appellant to relevant promotion lists, took place because appellant was prevented from appearing in the required examination i.e. Lower School Course and Intermediate class course---Appellant, in circumstances was declared entitled to seniority as A.S.-I. from the date he was promoted. Asif Nazir Awan for Appellant. Rana Muhammad Yasin, District Attorney for Respondents. Naseer Ahmad, Inspector Legal, on behalf of Respondent No.2. Date of hearing: 27th July, 2005. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD AFZAL (MEMBER-I).--- As per facts leading to this service appeal, the appellant joined as police constable in 1972. Further promotion of the appellant was subject to being admitted to List B/1 and passing of the lower school examination. This examination for one reason or the other, did not take place and resultantly the appellant crossed the upper age limit prescribed for appearing in that examination/course. Appellant feeling aggrieved filed Appeal No.576/782 of 1983 in this Tribunal vide which case was remanded to the I.-G.P. for re-consideration through orders, dated 5-6-1984. However,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492