Case Details

Citation(s)
2002 SLG 1613 2002 SLD 1613 (2002) 258 ITR 359
Delhi High Court
IT APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2002, AUGUST 21, 2002
D.K, JAIN AND MS. SHARDA AGGARWAL, JJ
Jagdish Rai Goel for the Appellant. P.C. Sharada for the
Respondent

Commissioner of IncomE tax

VS

Kishan Lal (HUF)

Law: Income Tax Act, 1961

Section: 234A,260A,156

Section 234A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Interest chargeable - Whether in view of decision of Supreme Court in CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd. [2001] 247 ITR 209/114 Taxman 414, notice of demand claiming interest can be issued only when there is direction in assessment order for levying interest - Held, yes - Tribunal deleted interest charged under sections 234A and 234B, as there was no direction in assessment order for charging of interest - Whether since no question of law arose from order of Tribunal, appeal was liable to be dismissed - Held, yes CASES REFERRED TO CIT v. Ranchi Club Ltd. [2001] 247 ITR 209/114 Taxman 414 (SC) [Para 2], Ranchi Club Ltd. v. CIT [1996] 217 ITR 72 / 85 Taxman 201 (Pat.) [Para 2], Uday Mistanna Bhandar & Complex v. CIT [1996] 222 ITR 44 /[1997] 90 Taxman 500 (Pat.) [Para 2] and Smt. Tej Kumari v. CIT [2001] 247 ITR 210 (Pat.)(FB) [Para 3]. JUDGMENT 1. This is an appeal by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), challenging the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'B' (for short, 'the Tribunal'), dated August 23, 2001, deleting the interest charged under sections 234A and 234B of the Act. 2. We find that while granting relief to the assessee, the Tribunal has relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in CIT v. Ranchi…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492