| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2005 SLG 234 2005 SLD 234 2005 PTD 700 (2005) 91 TAX 405 |
Lahore High Court
Sales Tax Appeals Nos. 373, 374 and 375 of 2002, decision dated: 23rd February, 2004
NASIM SIKANDAR AND MUHAMMAD SAIR ALI, JJ
Imtiaz Rashid Siddiqui for Appellant. Qamar ud Din Ahmad Mian for
Respondent
Sales Tax Appeals Nos. 373, 374 and 375 of 2002, decision dated: 23rd February, 2004
NASIM SIKANDAR AND MUHAMMAD SAIR ALI, JJ
Imtiaz Rashid Siddiqui for Appellant. Qamar ud Din Ahmad Mian for
Respondent
Messrs JAWA CHEMICALS (PVT.) LTD
VS
ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX, LAHORE
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 2,2(37),3,6,22,23,26;46,47
Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)---Ss. 2(37), 3, 6, 22, 23, 26; 46 & 47---Remand of case by Tribunal--- Appeal to High Court---Local office of Sales Tax Department on scrutiny of sales tax/private record of two appellants Companies found that companies had supplied taxable goods to different persons without payment of sales tax and further tax---Companies accordingly were charged with contravention of different sections of Sales Tax Act, 1990 and were proceeded against---Appeal filed by appellant companies was pending before Tribunal-- -Appeal filed by Revenue was also pending--Tribunal by way of impugned order disposed of two appeals filed by appellants Companies and the other filed by Department by remanding matter to original Authority---Validity---Remand of matter for fresh adjudication was not warranted and remand was directed on ground which was not even the grievance of the Revenue---Tribunal aught to have recorded its finding on the legal objections raised before it against maintainability of Departmental appeal---Remand of a matter to a lower Authority should only be made if material already available on record was not sufficient to dispose of the issues---In Revenue matters benefit of any defaults on the part of detecting agency or Assessing Officer were to go to taxpayers---In the present case, Tribunal apparently avoided ruling upon legal objection raised before it---High .Court set aside impugned order of Tribunal with direction that ' Tribunal would dispose of legal as well as factual issues raised before it by both Revenue as , well as taxpayers/two Companies---Two appeals by tax payer companies and one by Revenue, would be deemed pending before Tribunal to be decided after hearing parties within specified period. JUDGMENT NASIM SIKANDAR, J.---Through this judgment S.T.A. Nos.373, 374 and 375 of 2002 shall be disposed of. 2. These three appeals assail a common order recorded by learned Customs Central Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, dated 18-6-2002. Through that judgment a consolidated Order-in-Original No.98-99/2000 earlier recorded by Addl. Collector Sales Tax, Lahore on 23-5-2000 was set aside and the matter was remitted to Collector…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492