| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 1198 2008 SLD 1198 2008 PLC 173 |
Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad
Appeals Nos.449(R)CS and 611(R)CS of 2004, decided on 20th September, 2007, Date of hearing: 20th September, 2007.
, JUSTICE (R) TANVIR BASHIR ANSARI, CHAIRMAN AND RASHID MAHMOOD ANSARI, MEMBER
Ijaz Hussain Shah for Appellants. Khalil-ur-Rehman Abbasi for
Respondents with Muhammad Ilyas Jami, Assistant Director, FDEI, Khalid Hussain Assistant, Estt. Division and Butay Khan Kokab, Assistant Accounts Officer, AGPR, as Departmental Representatives
Appeals Nos.449(R)CS and 611(R)CS of 2004, decided on 20th September, 2007, Date of hearing: 20th September, 2007.
, JUSTICE (R) TANVIR BASHIR ANSARI, CHAIRMAN AND RASHID MAHMOOD ANSARI, MEMBER
Ijaz Hussain Shah for Appellants. Khalil-ur-Rehman Abbasi for
Respondents with Muhammad Ilyas Jami, Assistant Director, FDEI, Khalid Hussain Assistant, Estt. Division and Butay Khan Kokab, Assistant Accounts Officer, AGPR, as Departmental Representatives
ABDUL QAYYUM MIRZA and another
VS
DIRECTOR-GENERAL, FEDERAL DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, ISLAMABAD and 5 others
Law: Civil Servants Act, 1973
Section: 9
Law: Service Tribunals Act, 1973
Section: 4
Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)--- ----S. 9---Service. Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4---Appeal to Service Tribunal---Promotion, entitlement to---Central Selection Board, after considering case of appellants, had recommended them for promotion to the post of Principal in BS-20---Recommendations of Central Selection Board, though were made prior to retirement of appellants after reaching age of superannuation, but summary for approval of promotion of appellants was sent by the Establishment Division for approval of Prime Minister after delay of 58 days when appellants had retired from service---Effect---Appellants could not be deprived of the benefits of promotion if they had been ignored on account of a default of concerned authorities---Recommendations of the Departmental Promotion Committee or the Central Election Board, were entitled to greatest respect and utmost consideration---Selection Boards and Promotion Committees were in fact the substitutes for and an alternative to Public Service Commission---Sanctity of their recommendations being established, it was incumbent upon the concerned Ministry and Establishment Division to transmit such advice and recommendations with alacrity and dispatch so that the advice was accepted quickly by the competent Authority---If the Prime Minister or the Minister concerned did not agree with the recommendations, he could return the same to the Board or the Committee for further advice and thereafter proceed accordingly---Emphasis, in all that process, would always be upon the promptness of action by all concerned---Promotion was the advancement of an official from a lower to a higher post or grade against a vacancy specially reserved for such advancement under the relevant recruitment rules---Such advancement was the prime goal of an official during service---Where an employee was recommended for promotion and was also approaching superannuation, it was imperative for the concerned Ministry and the Establishment Division to make a specific endorsement upon the relevant summary regarding the impending date of superannuation---Such was necessary to emphasize urgency in the matter for the action of the competent…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492