| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2008 SLG 1223 2008 SLD 1223 2008 PLC 261 |
Service Tribunal, Punjab
Appeal No.1823 of 2006, decided on 18th June, 2007, Date of hearing; 18th June, 2007.
ARSHAD BIN AHMAD, MEMBER-III
Rizwana Anjum Mufti for Appellant. Mian Javed Ismail, Distt. Attorney and Zia Ahmad, Inspector, Legal, Departmental Representative for
Respondent.
Appeal No.1823 of 2006, decided on 18th June, 2007, Date of hearing; 18th June, 2007.
ARSHAD BIN AHMAD, MEMBER-III
Rizwana Anjum Mufti for Appellant. Mian Javed Ismail, Distt. Attorney and Zia Ahmad, Inspector, Legal, Departmental Representative for
Respondent.
SHAUKAT ALI
VS
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CITY MULTAN and another
Law: Punjab Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, (XVII of 2000)
Section: 3,5,10
Law: Punjab Service Tribunals Act, (IX of 1974)
Section: 4
Punjab Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance (IV of 2000)--- ----Ss. 3, 5 10---Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S.4---Dismissal from service---Appeal against---Appellant was dismissed from service, without holding any regular inquiry against him on allegation that he indulged in act of moral turpitude for which a criminal case was registered against him---Appellant was acquitted in the criminal charges brought up against him by the Trial Court---Said acquittal was based on the evidence recorded in the Court by the prosecution witnesses and other documentary evidence produced before the Trial Court---Appellant, who was behind the bars, could not have the opportunity of his self--defence---Action of authorities, in circumstances, had negated the very basic principle of natural justice---No one would be condemned unheard---Appellant was dismissed from service at a time when he was helpless---Authorities should have provided full opportunity of self-defence to appellant and then proceeded to take action on the basis of the outcome of said regular proceedings/inquiry---Impugned orders were set aside and appellant was reinstated in service---Department could hold fresh proceedings under the law including regular inquiry---Intervening period during which appellant remained out of service was left to be decided by the competent authority after the outcome of the fresh proceedings. 2007 SCMR 192; 2001 SCMR 269; PLD 2003 SC 187; 1981 PLC 159 and 2006 SCMR 104 rel. JUDGMENT ARSHAD BIN AHMAD (MEMBER-III).---The appellant, Shoukat Ali, ex-driver/constable, Multan Police has assailed the impugned order, dated 6-12-2004 whereby he was dismissed from service by the Superintendent of Police, City Multan/respondent No.1. His departmental appeal/representation was rejected vide impugned order, dated 6-6-2006. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant contended that, the appellant was served with a show-cause notice, dated 28-10-2004 with the following allegations:-- You indulged in act of moral turpitude for which case F.I.R. No.803 of 2004, dated 26-10-2004 under sections 10(4)/11/7/79, I.L. Police Station New Multan has been registered against you.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492