Law:

Section:

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)-------S. 115---Educational institution---Correction of date of birth---Board of Education issued matric certificate mentioning the same date which applicant had mentioned in his Admission Form-Suit for correction of date of birth was filed by the applicant after nine years---Counsel for the applicant was unable to point out any defect in the concurrent findings of both the courts below---In absence of any defect of misreading or non-reading of evidence in concurrent findings of two courts below, interference of High Court in civil revision would amount to improper exercise of revisional jurisdiction---Re-examination and reappraisal of evidence was not permissible in revisional jurisdiction, even if another view different from the impugned order could also be taken---No illegality or irregularity having been found in the concurrent findings of the lower courts, same could not be interfered with by the High Court in its revisional jurisdiction. Muhammad Hassan for Applicant. Syed Masroor Ahmed Alvi for Respondent. ORDER FAISAL ARAB, J.--- Applicant has impugned the concurrent findings of the lower Courts stating that his correct date of birth is 19-11-1980 and not 19-11-1979. It has come…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492