| Citation(s) |
| 2003 SLG 851 2003 SLD 851 2003 PTD 173 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
Central Excise Appeals Nos. H-168 and H-8 of 2000, decision
dated: 20-03-2002
ZAFAR IQBAL, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) AND MRS. YASMEEN ABBASEY, MEMBER(JUDICIAL)
Muhammad Naeem for Appellant. Abdul Saeed Khan, Superintendent for
Respondent
Deprecated: preg_match(): Passing null to parameter #2 ($subject) of type string is deprecated in
/home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line
429
Deprecated: htmlspecialchars(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in
/home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line
453
Law: Central Excise Act, (I of 1944)
Section: 3
(Central Excises Act (I of 1944)].......S 3 & First Sched., Hdg. 9817.0000---Central Excise Rules, 1944, R-96ZZO ---Excise duty on Services, levy of---Legality---Supply of national gas to consumers by a person, firm or company engaged in supply or distribution thereof---Such Service is an "excisable service" chargeable to Central Excise duty. (b) Central Excises Act (I of 1944)--S.3 & First Sched., Hdg. 9817.0000---Central Excise Rules, 1944, R.96ZZO---S.R.O. 455(I)/96, dated 13-6-1996---Natural Gas Rules, 1960, Rr. 2(c) & 3---Excise duty on Services, levy of---Supply of natural gas to Staff Canteen located at production .fields by appellant--Company engaged in exploration and production of gas---Adjudicating Officer adjudged such supply to be excisable services, thus, raised demand of duty---Validity---Not sufficient merely that a person engaged in use of gas became a person liable to duty only a person, firm or company engaged in supply or distribution of natural gas could be made liable to duty under S.3 of the Act read with R.96ZZO of Central Excise Rules, 1944---Appellant had never engaged itself in distribution or supply of natural gas to consumers, rather same was engaged in drilling out gas from gas-fields and for carrying on operations of gas drilling, field staff used gas for preparation of foods etc.---Such act of appellant did not fell within framework of excise law---Gas supplied from gas field to on site workers did not fell within definition of "excisable services" as given in S.2(2) of the Act---Duty was chargeable on service charges at the gate of 10% whereas appellant had neither charged its staff nor received any charges---Appellant did not fall within any definitions given in Natural Gas Rules,. 1960---Natural Gas Rules, 1960 provided an exception to a flow line used for transportation or conduct of gas within leased area or from well-head to purification plant or connection with main 'transmission line within such area---Field camps and masses of appellant fell within such exception---Contract with appellant also provided that gas' used at the site and in gas fields would be exempt from domestic taxation, which contractual…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 510