| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2007 SLG 1838 2007 SLD 1838 2007 PLC 225 |
Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal, Sindh
Service Appeals Nos.3 of 2000, 38 of 2002 and 26 of 2003, decision dated: 5-09-2006.
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, CHAIRMAN AND KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Service Appeals Nos.3 of 2000, 38 of 2002 and 26 of 2003, decision dated: 5-09-2006.
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, CHAIRMAN AND KHILJI ARIF HUSSAIN, MEMBER
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
QAISAR ALI KHAN
VS
REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH and another QAISAR ALI KHAN vs REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH and another
Law:
Section:
Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973)-------S. 3-B---Adverse remarks---Expunction of-Appeal-Adverse remarks were consistently recorded in A.C.Rs. of appellant (judicial service)---Consistent view had been taken about shabby integrity of appellant---Very serious allegations had been levelled against him and he had not been able to establish any ill-will, malice or motive on the part of Reporting Officers to record such remarks---In view of his conduct/performance an opinion as appearing from the adverse remarks under challenge was formed by Reporting Officer---Evidently there were adequate reasons to form such opinion---Reporting Officer had specifically mentioned that despite counselling no improvement was found in his conduct/performance---Contention of appellant that no specific instances were quoted by Reporting Officer, was devoid of force as from the adverse remarks, it was clear that instances such as destroying the case property in collusion with police officials in the pending cases and complaints made by senior members of the Bar and the public as well" as the Judges were quoted by Reporting Officer---Delay in recording adverse remarks would not affect their efficacy or legality---Representations submitted by him were given due and proper consideration by the Chief Justice---Besides, he was afforded an opportunity of personal hearing while disposing of representation---After considering representations and hearing given to him in person same were rejected---Order passed by Authority/ Chief Justice, which was just, equitable and legally valid, same did not call for interference of any sort. Ch. Shabbir Hussain v. Registrar, Lahore High Court, Lahore 2004 PLC (C.S.) 235; Government of Punjab and another v. Ehsanul Haq; Sethi PL1 1986 SC 684; Syed Tahir Hussain Sherazi v. The Government of the Punjab 1990 SCMR 1510 and Lahore High Court, Lahore through Registrar v. K.M. Sohel 2001 PLC (C.S.) 1253 ref. Appellant in Person. Ahmed Pirzada, A.A.-G. for Respondent. JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI (CHAIRMAN).--- By this judgment we propose to dispose of above-noted three Service Appeals as all of them have been filed by the one and the same appellant i.e.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492