| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2009 SLG 461 2009 SLD 461 2009 CLC 177 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. No.S-404 and C.M.A. No.2971 of 2008, decision dated: 24-09-2008
GHULAM DASTAGIR A. SHAHANI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
C.P. No.S-404 and C.M.A. No.2971 of 2008, decision dated: 24-09-2008
GHULAM DASTAGIR A. SHAHANI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD YAKOOB
VS
Mst. ZAIBUNNISA and 2 others
Law: Limitation Act, 1908
Section: 5
Law: Limitation Act, 1908
Section: 5
Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)
Section: 16(1),16(2)
Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)-------Ss. 15 & 16(2)---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S.5---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Ejectment of tenant---Condonation of delay---Sufficient cause---Tenant failed to comply with tentative rent order thus his defence was struck off and eviction order was passed by Rent Controller--Appeal filed by tenant was dismissed by Appellate Court, as it was barred by limitation---Validity---Principle of justice and fair play could not help those who were extraordinarily negligent in asserting their right and despite becoming aware about alleged void order adverse to their interest remained in deep slumber, as each and every day was to be explained---Tenant had to establish that it was not possible for him to appear and was beyond his control to appear within a due course of time for a particular purpose and to show as to what was the `sufficient cause' or reason due to which he failed to appear before competent Court of law within a particular time---In case of non-compliance, negligence on the part of tenant could not be shifted to the other side---Tenant was not vigilant in respect of his claim and he had to suffer and nobody else could be blamed in such respect---Each and every case was to be decided on its own merits and even one day's delay could not be condoned---Tenant could not invoke constitutional jurisdiction of High Court as no illegality or violation of law was pointed out by him---Order of eviction passed by two courts below being proper and legal, did not require any interference and were maintained by High Court---Petition was dismissed in circumstances. Muhammad Raz Khan v. Government of N.-W.F.P and another PLD 1997 SC 397 and Muhammad Raz Khan v. Government of N.-W.F.P and another PLD 1997 S.0 397 ref. Noor Hussain v. Muhammad Salim 1985 SCMR 893 rel. Shamshad Ali Qureshi for Petitioner. ORDER GHULAM DASTAGIR A. SHAHANI, J.---Constitution Petition is submitted on behalf of the petitioner namely Muhammad Yaqoob son of Abdul Shakoor, whereby the petitioner called in question the order passed by learned IX-Senior Civil Judge/Rent Controller Karachi East on 23-7-2007…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492