| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2009 SLG 465 2009 SLD 465 2009 CLC 279 |
Lahore High Court
F.A.O. No.194 of 2007, decision dated: 10-10-2008
SYED ASGHAR HAIDER, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
F.A.O. No.194 of 2007, decision dated: 10-10-2008
SYED ASGHAR HAIDER, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Mian MUHAMMAD LATEEF
VS
Mst. NASIMA WARSI through L.R.
Law: Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963
Section: 17(8),17(9),17(6),24(3),17A,17(4)
Law: Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963
Section: 17(8),17(9),17(6),24(3),17A,17(4)
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 107,96
(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)-------S. 17---Ejectment of tenant---Bona fide personal need of landlord---Proof---Non-disclosure of other properties owned by landlady---Effect---Rent Controller allowed ejectment application and passed eviction order on the ground of bona fide need of landlady---Plea raised by tenant was that the landlady did not require the premises for herself and she did not disclose in her application the other properties owned by her---Validity---Personal bona fide need of landlady and an affirmative statement coupled with test of cross-examination was sufficient for the purpose of discharging onus by landlady in such respect---Landlady had unequivocally stated that the property most suitable for need of her daughter to establish a clinic was the one which was occupied by tenant---Held, it was prerogative of landlady to choose property of her choice and she was the best judge of her needs, therefore, she would succeed on such principle---Tenant could not impose his will and desire on landlady and in such context heavy burden was upon tenant to disprove need of landlady---No convincing evidence was available on record produced by tenant to disprove need of landlady and witnesses produced by him were either interested in cause or not acquainted with landlady's need, therefore, such witnesses could not judge her choice---Non-disclosure of other properties owned by landlady in her petition was neither necessary nor required under S.17 of Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963---High Court, in exercise of appellate jurisdiction, declined to interfere in eviction order passed by Rent Controller---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Dr. A.R. Khan v. Muhammad Ishaque 1972 SCMR 437; Allies Book Corporation through L.Rs. v. Sultan Ahmad and others 2006 SCMR 152; Syed Rashid Hussain and 2 others v. Hussain Haji Ahmad PLD 1973 Note 138 at page 209; S.M. Noor-ud-Din and 9 others v. Saga Printers 1998 SCMR 2119; Muhammad Din v. Nazir Ahmad 1982 CLC 1737; Muhammad Ihsan v. Muhammad Hafeez 1994 CLC 84; Nasrullah Jan v. Mst. Farzana Begum and 6 others 2002 CLC 1523; Farooq Imran v. Mst. Hafeez Munir through Special Attorney 2006 YLR…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492