Law: Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)

Section: 44,45,124

Law: Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)

Section: 44,45,124

Law: Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912

Section: 10

Sindh Local Government Ordinance (XII of 1979)-------Ss. 44, 45, & 124---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199---Constitutional petition---Allotment of plot---Petitioner had sought directions to put him in physical possession of plot which was allotted to him on direction of the Prime Minister---Counsel for Authority had contended that the plots in residential scheme were to be allotted in accordance with the provisions of Sindh Local Government Ordinance, 1979---Validity---Admittedly no such scheme or statement of conditions existed under which any quota had been allocated to the Chief Minister or the Prime Minister for allotment---Public functionaries, how high they might be, were bound to act within the parameters of law---Duty of holder of political office was not to give any false hope---Purported order to allot plot in question to petitioner was passed in the year 1984, but he filed constitutional petition after lapse of more than two decades which suffered from laches---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Agha Fakhruddin v. Muhammad Paryal and others PLD 1989 SC 16; Agha Saifuddin and another v. Dr. Muhammad Ashfaq Piracha and another 1986 CLC 1819 and Abdul Haq v. Government of Sindh 2000 SCMR 907 ref. Mustafa Lakhani for Petitioner. Manzoor Ahmed for C.D.G.K. Abbas Ali, A.A.-G. along with Abdul Majeed Section Officer, Local Government, Department. ORDER Through this constitutional petition, petitioner has sought directions against the respondents Nos.2 and 3 to put him in physical possession of the Plot bearing No.N-55, Block No.9-B, Scheme No.36, Category N, situated in Gulistan-e-Johar, Karachi or in lieu thereof any alternate plot in the same scheme. It is the case of petitioner that the then worthy Chief Minister Sindh on the application of the petitioner directed the respondent No.3 to allot a plot; however, no plot, was allotted. Petitioner then approached the then Prime Minister complaining about the inaction on the part of the respondent No.3. It is the case of the petitioner that his application was marked to respondent No.3, E.D.O. (Revenue), Karachi, of the then K.D.A., for appropriate action on merits. It is…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492