| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2006 SLG 1973 2006 SLD 1973 2006 CLC 250 |
Sindh High Court
Constitutional Petition No.D-668 of 1998 and C.M.A. No.8578 of 2004, decision dated: 13-01-2005.
ATA-UR-REHMAN AND ZIA PERWAZ, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Constitutional Petition No.D-668 of 1998 and C.M.A. No.8578 of 2004, decision dated: 13-01-2005.
ATA-UR-REHMAN AND ZIA PERWAZ, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUHAMMAD WARIS and anothers
VS
CHIEF MINISTER, SINDH and 5 others
Law:
Section:
Sindh Urban State Land (Cancellation of Allotments, Conversions and Exchanges) Ordinance, (III of 2001)---------S. 3---Contempt of Court Ordinance (IV of 2003), Ss.3 & 4---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199 --Constitutional petition--Contempt of Court---Applicants/petitioners in their application for contempt of Court had sought action against alleged contemners for violation of order whereby their constitutional petition was allowed---Authority by its letter, referred the matter to Committee constituted under Sindh Urban State Land (Cancellation of Allotments, Conversions and Exchanges) Ordinance, 2001 and Committee exercising powers under said Ordinance, decided case of petitioners pertaining to plot and allowed petitioner to get it regularized subject to payment of amount mentioned in the decision---After the matter was referred to the Committee, petitioners were represented and heard before decision was taken by Committee---Petitioners had neither challenged action of Authority of referring matter to Committee nor challenged order of Committee before any forum for want of jurisdiction---Alleged contemners did not commit any Contempt of the Court in circumstances. M. Imtiaz Agha for Petitioners. ORDER By this application under sections 3 and 4 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance IV of 2003, the applicant seeks action against the alleged contemnors, mentioned in the. application, for violation of the order, dated 15-11-2002 whereby the petition was allowed. The Court, while allowing the petition, observed that though there was no material before it indicating that the cancellation had taken place under Ordinance III of 2001 but it was open for the Government to take any appropriate action as sanctioned by law. Respondent No.5 was also allowed to take any measures enjoying the sanction of law. The facts appear to be that the cancellation order, dated…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492