Case Details

Citation(s)
2010 SLG 2759 2010 SLD 2759 2010 SCMR 999
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Review Petition No.75 of 2008 (in Civil Appeal No. 91 of 2001) and Civil Review Petitions Nos.76 and 77 of 2008 (in Civil Appeals Nos. 92 and 93 of 2001), decision dated: 1st March, 2010
MIAN SHAKIRULLAH, JAN, ANWAR ZAHEER, JAMALI AND RAHMAT HUSSAIN, JAFFERI, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD ALTAF

VS

. PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and others MUHAMMAD AKBAR BAQIR Vs. PAKISTAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and others

Law:

Section:

Land Acquisition Act (I of 1894)-------Ss. 23 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.110 & O.XLV, R.1---Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O.XII, R.2 & O.XXVI, R.1---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.188, 185(2)(d) & (3)---Land acquisition---Compensation, determination of---Dismissal of first appeal by High Court---Petition for leave to appeal against impugned instead of filing direct appeal under S.54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894---Refusal of Supreme Court to convert such petition into appeal due to applicability of statutory provision and while treating same as direct appeal dismissed same as time-barred and on merits---Petition for review of such of Supreme Court on ground of non-taking into consideration question of limitation in its true perspective---Validity---After omission of S.110, C.P.C., rigours thereof applicable to appeals under S.54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had been diluted---Remedy of direct appeal under S.54 of the Act was proper remedy, which had not been availed within time---Period of limitation for direct appeal under S.54 of Act had expired much before 16-10-1998, when petitioner filed petition for leave to appeal against of High Court dated 19-11-1997 after excluding period lawfully consumed in obtaining its certified copy---Question of limitation was discretionary in nature, which Supreme Court had declined to examine in absence of application for condonation of delay by petitioner---Such exercise of discretion by Supreme Court being made judiciously was not open to review---Petitioner had not made out a case for review of impugned made on merits also---Review petition was dismissed in circumstances. Abdur Rauf Khan v. Land Acquisition Collector 1991 SCMR 2164; Chairman, N.-W.F.P. Forest Development Corporation v. Khurshid Anwar Khan 1992 SCMR 1202; Hyderabad Development Authority v. Abdul Majeed PLD 2002 SC 84; Taza Gui v. Fazal Subhan 2006 SCMR 504; Zulfiqar v. Shahadat Khan PLD 2007 SC 582 and Imtiaz Ali v. Atta Muhammad PLD 2008 SC 462 ref. WAPDA v. Saadullah Khan 1999 SCMR 319 rel. Malik Noor Muhammad Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Raja Muhammad Ibrahim Satti, Advocate Supreme Court for…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492