Case Details

Citation(s)
2006 SLG 1706 2006 SLD 1706 2006 PLC 545
Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal, Sindh
Service Appeals Nos.13 and 15 of 2002, decision dated: 10-12-2005.
JUSTICE MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, CHAIRMAN AND, JUSTICE REHMAT HUSSAIN, JAFFERI, MEMBER

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

MUHAMMAD BUX BHANGWAR and another

VS

HIGH COURT OF SINDH through Registrar MUHAMMAD BUX BHANGWAR and another vs HIGH COURT OF SINDH through Registrar

Law:

Section:

(a) Civil service-------ACR, recording of---Duties; functions and conduct of Judicial Officers---Judicial officers, were assigned duties to decide cases pertaining to life, liberty and property of citizens---Constitution had given guarantee to citizens that their said rights would be protected in accordance with law and it was incumbent upon Judicial Officers to act, work, discharge duty and behave in such a manner that confidence of people should not be shattered or eroded---Judicial Officers in performance of their duties, must present themselves in such a manner that nobody could raise a finger on them and people should feel secure that their rights would be decided, impartially, without fear and favour or on any extraneous considerations--Conduct, behaviour and character of judicial officers should be such that people should be encouraged to approach the Courts for deciding their disputes---Character, temperament, disposition, moral fibre, poise, nobility, dignity and other related matters of Judicial Officers should be of a very high calibre compared to other civil servants, because they decide the fate of citizens in respect of their life, liberty and property--Cases of Judicial Officers ought to be examined in the light of said circumstances---Under rules of discipline in the matters, of civil servants, character role or annual confidential report, was regarded as basic record that was required to be maintained every year to evaluate performance of civil servant and said report should be prepared very carefully---Reporting, Officer as well as Countersigning Officer were supposed to see that report should not reflect undue generosity or harshness. Jameel Ahmed Malik v. Pakistan Ordnance Factories Board 2004 SCMR 164 ref. (b) Civil service-- ----Adverse remarks---Expunction of---Employees, in the present case were Judicial Officers/Additional District and Sessions Judges, and Chief Justice had observed that civil servants were having corrupt reputation and gave certain other adverse remarks in their ACRs and communicated to them---Main attack of employees was that said adverse remarks. were communicated to them late---Validity---No doubt considerable delay…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492